Effects of body mass, climate, geography, and census area on population density of terrestrial mammals

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of climate, geography, census area and the distribution of body mass on the mass : density relationship in terrestrial mammal populations.LocationThe areas covered include most major terrestrial biomes including the tropics, savannas, and temperate forests.MethodData on population density and body mass from 827 populations belonging to 330 different terrestrial mammal species were derived from a review of the literature.ResultsLOWESS and polynomial regression analysis indicated that the overall mass : density relationship on log‐log scales was not linear and that the slope of this relationship behaves differently across the range of body mass. Body mass explained between 37 and 67% of the variability in population density depending upon the dietary category or the biome group. We also developed two multivariate models that can explain up to 65% of the variability in population density in terrestrial mammals. We also tested for a confounding effect of census area on the mass : density relationship on log‐log scales in terrestrial mammals.ConclusionsOur findings support previous studies suggesting that body mass is a major predictor of the variance in population density in terrestrial mammals. We suggest that the non‐linearity of the mass : density relationship may result from the fact that the overall distribution of body mass is a mixture of distributions across dietary groups and biomes. In contrast to body mass, our results indicate that climatic and geographical factors have a minor effect on population density. Although census area was closely correlated with body mass, body mass was generally a better predictor of population density than was census area.