Abstract

RA damages the joints and increases the risks of total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR). However, the benefits of biologics in preventing TKR or THR remain unclear. This retrospective nationwide study used the 2000-2013 claims-based National Health Insurance dataset. Biologics are reimbursed for refractory cases. The risks of TKR and THR in the biologic cohort were compared with those of an age- and sex-matched csDMARD cohort. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to investigate the benefits of bDMARDs for TKR and THR. TKR was performed in 5979 biologic cases and 11 958 matched controls, of which 249 (4.16%) and 871 (7.28%) cases received TKR, respectively. THR was performed in 6245 biologic cases and 12 490 matched controls, of which 159 (2.55%) and 516 (4.13%) cases had THR, respectively. The biologic cohort had significantly lower incidence rates of TKR (11.73 vs 16.33/1000 person-years, P < 0.001) and THR (7.09 vs 9.16/1000 person-years, P < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, the regular bDMARD subgroup (average dose >0.95 defined daily dose/day) had significantly lower risks of TKR (aHR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.81) and THR (aHR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.98). Those without MTX use, with steroid use, with biologic switch, and overlapping antiphospholipid syndrome had significantly higher risks of TKR and THR. Compared with the csDMARD cohort, the risks of TKR and THR in the bDMARD cohort were the same as those in the low-to-moderate dose subgroups and significantly lower in those with regular bDMARD use.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call