Abstract

BackgroundCross-sectional studies have shown that balance performance can be challenged by the level of task difficulty (e.g., varying stance conditions, sensory manipulations). However, it remains unclear whether the application of different levels of task difficulty during balance training (BT) leads to altered adaptations in balance performance. Thus, we examined the effects of BT conducted under a high versus a low level of task difficulty on balance performance.MethodsForty male adolescents were randomly assigned to a BT program using a low (BT-low: n = 20; age: 12.4 ± 2.0 yrs) or a high (BT-high: n = 20; age: 12.5 ± 2.5 yrs) level of balance task difficulty. Both groups trained for 7 weeks (2 sessions/week, 30–35 min each). Pre- and post-training assessments included measures of static (one-legged stance [OLS] time), dynamic (10-m gait velocity), and proactive (Y-Balance Test [YBT] reach distance, Functional Reach Test [FRT]; Timed-Up-and-Go Test [TUG]) balance.ResultsSignificant main effects of Test (i.e., pre- to post-test improvements) were observed for all but one balance measure (i.e., 10-m gait velocity). Additionally, a Test x Group interaction was detected for the FRT in favor of the BT-high group (Δ + 8%, p < 0.001, d = 0.35). Further, tendencies toward significant Test x Group interactions were found for the YBT anterior reach (in favor of BT-high: Δ + 9%, p < 0.001, d = 0.60) and for the OLS with eyes opened and on firm surface (in favor of BT-low: Δ + 31%, p = 0.003, d = 0.67).ConclusionsFollowing 7 weeks of BT, enhancements in measures of static, dynamic, and proactive balance were observed in the BT-high and BT-low groups. However, BT-high appears to be more effective for increasing measures of proactive balance, whereas BT-low seems to be more effective for improving proxies of static balance.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN83638708 (Retrospectively registered 19th June, 2020).

Highlights

  • Cross-sectional studies have shown that balance performance can be challenged by the level of task difficulty

  • balance training (BT)-low Balance training using a low level of task difficulty, BT-high Balance training using a high level of task difficulty

  • Static balance performance Irrespective of stance condition, the analyses revealed statistically significant main effects of Test (13.391 ≤ F1, 36 ≤ 37.044, p ≤ 0.001, 1.22 ≤ d ≤ 2.03) (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cross-sectional studies have shown that balance performance can be challenged by the level of task difficulty (e.g., varying stance conditions, sensory manipulations). It remains unclear whether the application of different levels of task difficulty during balance training (BT) leads to altered adaptations in balance performance. Gebel et al [5] conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis analyzing the effects and dose-response relationships of BT on balance performance in youth. Using this approach dose-response relationships are compared indirectly instead of directly. There is a need for research which (i) directly compares different training modalities within a single study and (ii) investigates load dimensions that have not been analyzed so far

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call