Abstract

A two-channel listening experiment was carried out in which subjects had to identify each member of pairs of nonsense syllables which coincided in time of onset and offset. The purpose of the experiment was to compare the effect of varying the intensity of the stimuli in one channel when stimuli pairs were presented dichotically (one to each ear) with the effect that occurred when both stimuli were directed monotically to a single ear. We could thus compare the effect of attenuation of one of the two competing speech signals when the competition involved peripheral masking (the monotic condition) with the effect obtained when the locus of masking was exclusively central (the dichotic condition). In the monotic case, the decrement in identification performance was nearly asymptotic with 10 dB of attenuation, whereas in the dichotic case the decrement in performance with attenuation was much less steep, not having reached asymptote at 25 dB of attenuation. These results agree with findings in visual masking studies with respect to the relatively greater importance of intensity difference among stimuli in peripheral masking than in central masking. [This research was supported in part by NSF Grant No. GJ-9.]

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.