Abstract

BackgroundStandardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare. We hypothesized that, compared to ordinary practice, a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol for HA implementation would better maintain or improve client outcomes over 1 year.MethodUsing a cluster design, South Swedish municipalities were recruited to an intervention or control group. Data on activities of daily living, usability of the home, health related quality of life, and participation frequency and satisfaction were collected at home visits 1 month before the HA (baseline; T1), and at 3 (T2), 6 (T3) and 12 (T4) months after. In the intervention group (n = 112) data were collected according to a standardized protocol while in the control group (n = 129) ordinary routines were applied. Changes from baseline to subsequent time points were categorized as no deterioration (i.e. improvement or no change) or deterioration, for each outcome item separately. Differences in “no deterioration” between the groups were assessed using logistic regression.ResultsLittle effect of using the standardized protocol was detected. For activities of daily living, statistically significant differences between the groups were found for toileting (T1-T4; OR 3.14), dressing (T1-T4; OR2.89) and cooking (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 3.14). For usability of the home differences were found in personal hygiene (T1-T2; OR 2.32) using a wheelchair (T1-T2 and T1-T3; OR 9.50), picking up the mail (T1-T3; OR 4.06), and in participation, helping others (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 2.33 and 3.36).ConclusionThe applied standardized protocol for HA implementation did not show any convincing effect, possibly due to the complexity of the intervention itself, and the implementation process. A process evaluation might generate in-depth knowledge about the reasons behind the findings.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01960582.

Highlights

  • Standardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare

  • For usability of the home differences were found in personal hygiene (T1-T2; odds ratios (ORs) 2.32) using a wheelchair (T1-T2 and T1-T3; OR 9.50), picking up the mail (T1-T3; OR 4.06), and in participation, helping others (T1-T3 and T1-T4; OR 2.33 and 3.36)

  • Housing adaptation (HA) is one intervention that provides solutions on a case-by-case basis to meet the specific needs of a person, that is, to enhance independent living in the own home [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Standardized, research-based strategies to guide the implementation and evaluate the effects of housing adaptations (HA) on client outcomes are rare. We hypothesized that, compared to ordinary practice, a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol for HA implementation would better maintain or improve client outcomes over 1 year. Over a billion people are estimated to live with some form of disability, and among them, between 110 (2.2%) and 190 million (3.8%) people aged 15 years and older have significant difficulties in functioning [1]. Being active and participating in everyday life despite increasing age and disability is considered to be crucial for health and well-being [1]. Among older people and people with disabilities in particular, the home environment plays a crucial role in enhancing everyday life. Housing adaptation (HA) is one intervention that provides solutions on a case-by-case basis to meet the specific needs of a person, that is, to enhance independent living in the own home [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call