Abstract

BackgroundAlthough a variety of antidiabetic drugs have significant protective action on the cardiovascular system, it is still unclear which antidiabetic drugs can improve ventricular remodeling and fundamentally delay the process of heart failure. The purpose of this network meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, metformin (MET), sulfonylurea (SU) and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in improving left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD).MethodsWe searched articles published before October 18, 2019, regardless of language or data, in 4 electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials in this network meta-analysis, as well as a small number of cohort studies. The differences in the mean changes in left ventricular echocardiographic parameters between the treatment group and control group were evaluated.ResultsThe difference in the mean change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between GLP-1 agonists and placebo in treatment effect was greater than zero (MD = 2.04% [0.64%, 3.43%]); similar results were observed for the difference in the mean change in LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) between SGLT-2 inhibitors and placebo (MD = − 3.3 mm [5.31, − 5.29]), the difference in the mean change in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) between GLP-1 agonists and placebo (MD = − 4.39 ml [− 8.09, − 0.7]); the difference in the mean change in E/e′ between GLP-1 agonists and placebo (MD = − 1.05[− 1.78, − 0.32]); and the difference in the mean change in E/e′ between SGLT-2 inhibitors and placebo (MD = − 1.91[− 3.39, − 0.43]).ConclusionsGLP-1 agonists are more significantly associated with improved LVEF, LVESV and E/e′, SGLT-2 inhibitors are more significantly associated with improved LVEDD and E/e′, and DPP-4 inhibitors are more strongly associated with a negative impact on LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) than are placebos. SGLT-2 inhibitors are superior to other drugs in pairwise comparisons.

Highlights

  • A variety of antidiabetic drugs have significant protective action on the cardiovascular system, it is still unclear which antidiabetic drugs can improve ventricular remodeling and fundamentally delay the process of heart failure

  • 7 trials concerned MET, 25 trials involved glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, 10 studies reported dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, 3 studies discussed sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, 8 studies referred to TZDs and 5 studies covered SU

  • We found that compared with placebo, GLP-1 agonists increased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and decreased LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) and E/e′, and SGLT-2 inhibitors decreased LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and E/e′

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A variety of antidiabetic drugs have significant protective action on the cardiovascular system, it is still unclear which antidiabetic drugs can improve ventricular remodeling and fundamentally delay the process of heart failure The purpose of this network meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy of sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, metformin (MET), sulfonylurea (SU) and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in improving left ventricular (LV) remod‐ eling in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD). Two small randomized controlled trials showed that GLP-1 agonist infusion exerted a positive effect on patients with ischemic heart disease [4, 5] Traditional hypoglycemic drugs such as metformin (MET) have been found to have a positive effect on cardiovascular protection [6,7,8]. These results suggest that we should prioritize drugs that have some cardiovascular protective effects when choosing a treatment for diabetes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call