Abstract

Engineering Ethics is an example of a subject in which there is no single correct answer. Unlike most other courses in the engineering field, where problems have a unique answer, students need to derive an optimal solution according to the context. For the ethics cource, the objective is being able to apply the ideas in practice in the real world, and this should be more of a focus than being able to understand the specialist terminology and derive model solutions. Group discussions and analysis of past cases are effective ways of cultivating this kind of ethical sense. In this study, we used an audience response system in classes and evaluated the learning benefits. Having students' own responses visualized in real time encourages active learning while still maintaining continuity of instruction. In particular, in the group presentations for ethics case studies, peer evaluations of the presentation techniques as well as the content of the idead presented were used. Having the voting results visualized in real time was useful for encouraging students to take an active interest in listening to the presentations. This was an effective way to encourage students to come to their own conclusions wnile understanding the diverse range of values held by other people.

Highlights

  • The National Institutes of Technology (NIT) offer technical higher education institute in Japan

  • When the NIT system was first established, the idea was that these schools would train and develop “backbone engineers”, but in recent years the motto has shifted to “developing a diverse range of practical and creative engineers that can be active in a wide range of more advanced areas”[2] The expectation is that these educational institutions will act as cornerstones for fostering innovation as well as for transmitting and developing technical skills in the areas of manufacturing and craftsmanship[3]

  • In the free-form comment field students expressed views such as “I would like to give a presentation using Audience Response System (ARS) myself”, “I would like this system to be used in other classes as well”, “It was meaningful that minority opinions, which might be drowned out in group discussions, could be properly reflected in the questionnaire”, and “I felt that being able to see the collated results in real time gave the lesson

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Undergraduate programs at universities demand that students be able to effectively apply the knowledge that they acquire, through the positive adoption of active learning[4] Against this background, universities throughout Japan are seeking to formulate frameworks for study approaches that focus on self-evaluative problem-solving, and the introduction and creation of rubric-based evaluation, such as is widely used in US higher education. One initiative for encouraging students to take an active role in their learning is the use of an Audience Response System (ARS) These systems can collect students’ answers and responses and display the results in real time. Classtalk was the first popular Classroom communication systems, begun in 1985 and commercially available from 1992 through 1999 It was developed by a former NASA engineer, with National Science Foundation funding and in collaboration with educational researchers at several major universities[6]. This system has been introduced in many American universities[7], while in Japan

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call