Abstract

Through practice, people are able to integrate a secondary sequence (e.g., a stimulus-based sequence) into a primary sequence (e.g., a response-based sequence), but it is still controversial whether the integrated sequences lead to better learning than only the primary sequence. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of a sequence that integrated space and color sequences on early and late learning phases (corresponding to effector-independent and effector-dependent learning, respectively) and how the effects differed in the integrated and primary sequences in each learning phase. In the task, the participants were required to learn a sequence of button presses using trial-and-error and to perform the sequence successfully for 20 trials (m × n task). First, in the baseline task, all participants learned a non-colored sequence, in which the response button always turned red. Then, in the learning task, the participants were assigned to two groups: a colored sequence group (i.e., space and color) or a non-colored sequence group (i.e., space). In the colored sequence, the response button turned a pre-determined color and the participants were instructed to attend to the sequences of both location and color as much as they could. The results showed that the participants who performed the colored sequence acquired the correct button presses of the sequence earlier, but showed a slower mean performance time than those who performed the non-colored sequence. Moreover, the slower performance time in the colored sequence group remained in a subsequent transfer task in which the spatial configurations of the buttons were vertically mirrored from the learning task. These results indicated that if participants explicitly attended to both the spatial response sequence and color stimulus sequence at the same time, they could develop their spatial representations of the sequence earlier (i.e., early development of the effector-independent learning), but might not be able to enhance their motor representations of the sequence (i.e., late development of the effector-dependent learning). Thus, the undeveloped effector-dependent representations in the colored sequence group directly led to a long performance time in the transfer sequence.

Highlights

  • Learning behavioral sequences, such as typing on a keyboard, is important in our daily life

  • In order to investigate whether participants can use their obtained knowledge or motor representations in the learning task, all participants performed a non-colored sequence as a transfer task, in which the spatial configurations of the buttons were vertically mirrored from the learning task

  • We examined the effects of the combined sequence on effector-dependent and effector-independent learning in an explicit learning situation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Learning behavioral sequences, such as typing on a keyboard, is important in our daily life. In a typical SRT task, visual stimuli are successively presented at one of four or six horizontally aligned locations, and participants respond with spatially compatible key presses as quickly and accurately as possible (Nissen and Bullemer, 1987). They are not aware that a pre-determined sequence, typically composed of 8–12 key presses, was repeated during the experiment, their reaction times gradually become shorter, and are shorter than for randomly presented sequences. These results indicate that participants are able to learn both stimulus- and responsebased sequences, they are not aware of the sequence rule

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call