Abstract

Vergence eye movements are frequent in every day life and important for depth perception. Yet, studies of vergence in elderly are rare. We examined convergence and divergence between targets placed along median line at 20, 40 or 150cm. Thirteen elderly (70±11years) and ten young (25±3years) adults participated in the study. The gap paradigm (i.e., the fixed stimulus is extinguished prior to target onset) and the overlap paradigm (the fixed stimulus remains illuminated after target onset) were used to elicit reflexive or voluntary eye movements. Latency of convergence and divergence increased with age in both gap and overlap conditions. Both young subjects and elderly showed shorter latency of vergence under the gap condition than under the overlap condition. In the overlap condition, for elderly only, convergence resulted in longer latencies than divergence. In the gap condition express convergence was rare, while express latencies (80–120ms) were frequent for divergence starting from a near fixation point (at 20cm). The rates of express divergence were similar for young (23%) and elderly (21%). These results were in line with prior studies of saccades and indicated different aging effects on regular and express latencies.

Highlights

  • Fine Both stereopsis and bifoveal fixation of object of interest require precise alignment of the visual axes, which depend on vergence eye movements (Leigh & Zee, 2006)

  • The individual mean latencies of vergence and the standard errors (SE) were shown for the gap and the overlap conditions in adults and elderly in Figure 2 and Figure 3

  • The multiple analysis of variance (ANOVA) applied on the latency values with showed the following main effects: a significant effect of age (F1,21=11.31, p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fine Both stereopsis and bifoveal fixation of object of interest require precise alignment of the visual axes, which depend on vergence eye movements (Leigh & Zee, 2006). Vergence eye movements are necessary to change fixation from a far to a near target (convergence), or vice versa (divergence). More recent studies concerned vergence eye movements with targets in natural 3D space for which both disparity, accommodation and other high level proximal cues are involved (Kumar, Han, Garbutt & Leigh, 2002; Rambold, Neumann, Sander & Helmchen, 2006; Yang, Bucci & Kapoula, 2002). Latency of such vergence is about 200 ms. Only one study (Rambold et al, 2006) reported no latency difference between convergence and divergence, which needs further investigation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call