Abstract

AbstractTwo soluble fluorescent polymers, poly(2‐decyloxy‐5‐(4′‐tert‐butylphenyl)‐1,4‐phenylenevinylene) (DtBP‐PPV) and poly(2‐decyloxy‐1,4‐phenylenevinylene) (DO‐PPV), were prepared by a method similar to the Gilch procedure. The DtBP‐PPV and DO‐PPV have a same chemical structure except for the conjugated tert‐bytulphenyl substituents in the former. The polymers are characterized by using 1H NMR, FTIR, UV–vis, photoluminescence (PL), and electroluminescence (EL) spectroscopies and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The 1H NMR spectra show no tolane‐bis‐benzyl (TBB) structure defects in DtBP‐PPV but some in DO‐PPV. Both UV–vis absorption and PL emission peaks of the DtBP‐PPV exhibit a red‐shift phenomenon as compared with those of the DO‐PPV. Moreover, with the DtBP‐PPV and DO‐PPV acting as light‐emitting polymers separately, EL devices were fabricated with a sequential lamination of ITO/PEDOT/DtBP‐PPV (or DO‐PPV)/Ca/Ag. The DtBP‐PPV‐based device shows a lower turn‐on voltage, a longer EL emission wavelength, and a higher brightness than the DO‐PPV‐based device. The maximum brightness of DtBP‐PPV‐based device is 57 cd/m2 at an applied voltage of 12 V. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:1380–1387, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.