Abstract

Strategies to activate and engage patients and caregivers in shared decision making in the acute care setting may result in improved outcomes. To determine whether a patient activation tool (PAT) can improve decision-making and patient-centered outcomes among pediatric patients and their caregivers who choose between surgery and nonoperative management for their child's appendicitis. This single-blind, randomized clinical trial collected data from a single tertiary children's hospital from March 1, 2014, through April 30, 2016, with 1-year follow-up completed on May 1, 2017. Two hundred of 236 eligible children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years with uncomplicated appendicitis enrolled with their caregivers. After receiving the randomized clinical intervention, caregivers chose surgery or nonoperative management. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2014, through May 1, 2017. Randomization to a scripted standardized surgical consultation that emphasized patient choice or a scripted standardized surgical consultation plus the PAT (a tablet-based tool that presents each treatment, encourages participation in medical decision making, and aims at alleviating decisional uncertainty). Decisional self-efficacy immediately after treatment decision, health care satisfaction at discharge, and disability days for the child at 1-year follow-up. Among 200 participants (median age, 12 years [interquartile range (IQR), 9-15 years]; 120 [60.0%] male), 98 were randomized to the PAT and 102 to the standardized consultation groups. The percentages choosing nonoperative management were similar (standardized consultation group, 42 of 102 [41.2%]; PAT group, 31 of 98 [31.6%]; P = .19). Immediate decisional self-efficacy was similar in the standardized consultation and PAT groups (median score, 100 [IQR, 97.7-100] vs 100 [IQR, 95.5-100]; P = .03), which was not significant at the planned significance level of P = .02. Total scores on health care satisfaction at discharge were similar (median, 99 [IQR, 94.7-100] vs 98 [IQR, 91.7-100]; P = .27). Disability days at 1-year follow-up were also similar (median, 6 [IQR, 2-11] vs 5 [IQR, 2-15]; P = .67). No difference in the failure rate of nonoperative management at 1 year (13 of 38 [34.2%] vs 11 of 30 [36.7%]; P > .99) or in the rate of complicated appendicitis 30 days after discharge (7 of 68 [10.3%] vs 9 of 71 [12.7%]; P = .79) occurred. In this study, a technology-based PAT did not improve measures of decision making for pediatric patients and caregivers needing to make an urgent treatment decision between surgery and nonoperative management for appendicitis. However, the overall high scores in both groups suggest that pediatric patients and caregivers can process information in the acute care setting and effectively participate in an informed shared decision-making process around the need for surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02110485.

Highlights

  • Shared decision making with active engagement of patients in health care decisions has been referred to as the pinnacle of patient-centered care.[1]

  • The overall high scores in both groups suggest that pediatric patients and caregivers can process information in the acute care setting and effectively participate in an informed shared decision-making process around the need for surgery

  • When we examined the primary outcomes based on randomized group and treatment choice, we found a significant difference in decisional self-efficacy, with patients in the patient activation tool (PAT) group who chose antibiotics having the lowest median score (97.7 [interquartile range (IQR), 93.2-100] compared with median scores of 100 for the standardized consultation group choosing surgery [IQR, 100-100], the PAT group choosing surgery [IQR, 95.5-100], and the standardized consultation group choosing antibiotics [IQR, 95.5-100]; P = .02)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shared decision making with active engagement of patients in health care decisions has been referred to as the pinnacle of patient-centered care.[1]. High-acuity illness has been directly associated with patient and caregiver stress, decreased comprehension, and impaired recall.[9,10,11,12,13,14,15] Emergency surgical interventions present stressful and difficult decisions for patients and caregivers with limited time for patient activation, engagement, and shared decision making. This situation is especially true in vulnerable populations such as children, for whom caregivers are forced to make quick decisions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call