Effectiveness of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Abstract

BackgroundPredicting the mortality and prognosis of patients with stroke is one of the commonly studied topics. Various scoring systems have been used in this regard. One of them is the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score. In this study, we aimed to investigate the utility of the FOUR scores in terms of their ability to predict hospital stay duration and mortality in patients who were diagnosed with ischemic stroke upon their admission to the emergency department.MethodsOur study is a prospective observational study. Patients who were admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital and diagnosed with ischemic stroke between August 1, 2020, and August 1, 2021, were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: being over the age of 18, being diagnosed with ischemic stroke, having symptoms that started within the last 48 hours, and patient consent approved by the patients themselves or their relatives. The patients were divided into two groups according to the FOUR scores (FOUR score = 16 and FOUR score < 16). Patients’ demographic information, vital parameters, symptoms, time to admission, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, length of hospitalization, mortality, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), FOUR, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were recorded.ResultsA total of 79 patients were included in the current study, of which 47 (59.5%) were male. The patients included in the present study had a mean age of 66 ± 13 years. When the two groups of patients with a FOUR score of 16 and a FOUR score of below 16 were compared, the mean platelet count was found to be 248 ± 70 × 103/L in the former group and 170 ± 84 × 103/L in the latter (p = 0.004). Sixty-five (91.5%) of the patients in the group with a FOUR score of 16 and three (37.5%) of the patients in the group with a FOUR score of less than 16 stayed for more than six hours in the hospital (p < 0.001). When the patients were evaluated for intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, five (62.5%) patients with a FOUR score of <16 were admitted to the ICU. This rate was 2.8% (n = 2) in the group of patients with a FOUR score of 16 and was found to be significantly lower (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe FOUR score was found to be useful in predicting the ICU admission rate of patients with ischemic stroke. It has also been shown that the admission time was shorter in patients with a lower FOUR score, and platelet counts were also lower in this group.