Abstract

Background: Auditory temporal processing tests are key clinical measures in order to diagnose central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Although these tests have been used for decades, there is no up-to-date evidence to determine the effectiveness of detecting the abnormalities in central auditory processing in adults while the available national CAPD guidelines predominantly address CAPD in the pediatric population.Purpose: To determine the efficacy of the auditory temporal ordering tests [duration pattern test (DPT) and frequency pattern test (FPT)], and a temporal resolution test [gaps-in-noise (GIN) test] for detecting the central auditory processing abnormalities in adults with documented brain pathology.Research Design: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Study samples: Four databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus, were systematically searched. The publications in the English language that recruited adults (above 16 years old) with pathologic brain conditions and described the diagnostic tests for auditory temporal processing were selected for review.Data Collections and Analysis: All data were systematically evaluated, extracted, categorized, and summarized in tables. The meta-analysis was done in order to determine the effectiveness of the DPT, FPT, and GIN tests.Results: The results showed significantly poorer performance of DPT and FPT, compared between participants with confirmed brain disease and normal controls, at the mean differences of percent correct −21.93 (95% CI, −26.58 to −17.29) and −31.37 (95% CI, −40.55 to −22.19), respectively. Subjects with brain pathology also performed poorer in GIN test at the mean difference of 3.19 milliseconds (95% CI, 2.51 to 3.87).Conclusion: The results from the meta-analysis provide evidence that DPT, FPT, and GIN clinical measures are effective in the diagnosis of CAPD in adults with neurological disorders. Poor performance on these tests is significantly related to the confirmed brain pathology. However, different units in results presentation and variety of testing strategies are limitations for this meta-analysis. The standard pattern of result reporting and international protocols test strategies should be developed in order to conduct better meta-analyses with a larger collection of suitable studies and less heterogeneity.

Highlights

  • Definition of Auditory Processing DisorderCentral auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is a clinical diagnosis that is characterized by normal hearing thresholds and a variety of hearing symptoms, including difficulties understanding speech in noisy environments, discriminating speech, localizing sounds, auditory inattention, or memory difficulties, that arise due to abnormal auditory processing within the brain

  • There are various types of tests for central auditory nervous system (CANS) assessment, this review focuses on the studies that evaluate the ability of auditory temporal processing tests that are commonly used in clinical applications for central auditory processing evaluation (3, 4)

  • The results showed a significant reduction of heterogeneity from 93% to 0%, while the mean difference was still significantly better in the control group (Figure 6)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Definition of Auditory Processing DisorderCentral auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is a clinical diagnosis that is characterized by normal (or near-normal) hearing thresholds and a variety of hearing symptoms, including difficulties understanding speech in noisy environments, discriminating speech, localizing sounds, auditory inattention, or memory difficulties, that arise due to abnormal auditory processing within the brain. There is a variety of tests that assess the different auditory processing domains, including auditory discrimination, temporal processing, dichotic listening, low-redundancy speech recognition (monaural), and binaural interaction (2). Baseline audiological assessments such as standard pure-tone audiometry, speech-in-quiet audiometry, otoacoustic emissions, and electrophysiological measures are important when assessing for CAPD in order to control for the presence of peripheral auditory impairment, and complement behavioral auditory processing tests. Auditory temporal processing tests are key clinical measures in order to diagnose central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). The publications in the English language that recruited adults (above 16 years old) with pathologic brain conditions and described the diagnostic tests for auditory temporal processing were selected for review

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call