Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of synthetic implants for genital prolapse surgery in women of different age groups.
 Materials and Methods. 139 patients underwent genital prolapse surgery, vaginal approach, with synthetic mesh and biologic grafts. For the anterior, posterior and complete reconstruction of the vaginal walls, two mesh implants were used: Pelvix (Lintex, Russia) and Prolift (Ethicon Women´s Health and Urology, Johnson and Johnson Company, USA). The size of mesh implant was adapted to each particular case.
 Results. The most common intraoperative complication was intraoperative blood loss. During pelvic floor reconstruction with mesh implants, it was 1.8 times and 1.5 times higher in reproductive age and perimenopause respectively, compared with grafts. In postmenopause, there was a tendency to greater blood loss in surgeries with biological grafts. In reproductive age, the frequency of early postoperative complications was the same for mesh and non-mesh repair. In perimenopause, complications were three times more often for mesh repair, and in postmenopause, complications were observed in every third examined patient, regardless of the repair used. Late postoperative complications (pelvic pain and dyspareunia) occurred more often for biological graft: in reproductive age – twice, in perimenopause – 1.5 times, and in postmenopause – 5 times as frequently as for mesh.
 Conclusion. Prolapse surgery with synthetic implants is effective, safe and justified in terms of pathogenesis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call