Abstract

Implementation of stroke early supported discharge (ESD) services has been recommended in many countries' clinical guidelines, based on clinical trial evidence. This is the first observational study to investigate the effectiveness of ESD service models operating in real-world conditions, at scale. Using historical prospective data from the United Kingdom Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2016), measures of ESD effectiveness were "days to ESD" (number of days from hospital discharge to first ESD contact; n=6222), "rehabilitation intensity" (total number of treatment days/total days with ESD; n=5891), and stroke survivor outcome (modified Rankin scale at ESD discharge; n=6222). ESD service models (derived from Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme postacute organizational audit data) were categorized with a 17-item score, reflecting adoption of ESD consensus core components (evidence-based criteria). Multilevel modeling analysis was undertaken as patients were clustered within ESD teams across the Midlands, East, and North of England (n=31). A variety of ESD service models had been adopted, as reflected by variability in the ESD consensus score. Controlling for patient characteristics and Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme hospital score, a 1-unit increase in ESD consensus score was significantly associated with a more responsive ESD service (reduced odds of patient being seen after ≥1 day of 29% [95% CI, 1%-49%] and increased treatment intensity by 2% [95% CI, 0.3%-4%]). There was no association with stroke survivor outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale. This study has shown that adopting defined core components of ESD is associated with providing a more responsive and intensive ESD service. This shows that adherence to evidence-based criteria is likely to result in a more effective ESD service as defined by process measures. Registration: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/; Unique identifier: ISRCTN15568163.

Highlights

  • Implementation of stroke early supported discharge (ESD) services has been recommended in many countries’ clinical guidelines, based on clinical trial evidence

  • A 1-unit increase in the ESD score was associated with an odds ratio of 0.71, or in other words, with a reduced odds of the ESD team seeing the patient after ≥1 day following hospital discharge

  • Exploring the effect of components, this association appeared to be driven by having more core team members meeting or exceeding recommended whole time equivalent level per 100 patients with stroke (a 1-unit increase was significantly associated with a 47% reduction in the odds of the ESD team seeing the patient after ≥1 day [95% CI, 14%–67%])

Read more

Summary

Objectives

By investigating if and how these aspects of an effective ESD service can be realized in practice, this study aims to inform provision of evidence-based care for stroke survivors. The aim of the current study was to determine if such core components had been adopted by ESD teams in real-world settings in England and whether these related to realized benefits of ESD. The aim of the study was to examine the association between ESD service models, and process, and patient outcome measures of ESD effectiveness. There are limitations inherent to observational data, which we aimed to address with the study design

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call