Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of resin-based materials against erosive enamel wear under erosive and abrasive challenges by orange juice and tooth brushing. Fifty enamel specimens from third molars were assigned to five groups: ICON resin infiltration with no etching (ICON-NE), ICON resin infiltration with 15% HCl etching (ICON-AE), Seal & Protect sealant (S&P), Tetric EvoFlow (TEF), and control. Erosive lesions were first created on enamel, then treated with resin-based materials. Erosive and abrasive challenges by orange juice and tooth brushing were repeated after treatments. Erosive wear of the treated areas was measured with 3D scanning microscopy, and data were analyzed using ANOVA and paired t tests. Treatments with ICON, S&P, and TEF created a protective material coating of 4.5±1.9μm, 44.3±8.1μm, and 84.6±15.7μm in thickness on the lesion surfaces, respectively. After 15cycles of erosive and abrasive challenges, enamel or material losses were 21.9±2.3μm for control, 24.5±4.0μm for ICON-NE, 24.6±7.4μm for ICON-AE, 11.2±4.1μm for S&P, and 3.9±1.9μm for TEF, respectively. The protective coatings were completely lost in the ICON infiltration groups but remained intact in both the S&P and TEF groups after erosive and abrasive challenges. In contrast to a resin sealant and a flowable composite, ICON infiltration resin was not effective in protecting enamel surfaces from erosive and abrasive wear. Sealant and flowable composite resin may create protective coatings on eroded enamel surfaces and prevent further tissue loss.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call