Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the association between prehospital epinephrine administration by emergency medical services (EMS) and the long-term outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with initial pulseless electrical activity (PEA) or asystole. Methods: We conducted a controlled, propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study by using Japan's nationwide OHCA registry database. We studied 110,239 bystander-witnessed OHCA patients aged 15–94 years with initial non-shockable rhythms registered between January 2008 and December 2012. We created 1–1 matched pairs of patients with or without epinephrine by using sequential risk set matching based on time-dependent propensity scores to balance the patients' severity and characteristics. We compared overall and neurologically intact survival 1 month after OHCA between cases and controls using conditional logistic regression models by category of the initial rhythm. Results: Propensity matching created 7,431 pairs in patients with PEA and 8,906 pairs in those with asystole. Epinephrine administration was associated with higher overall survival (4.49% vs. 2.96%; odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–1.85) but not with neurologically intact survival (0.98% vs. 0.78%; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.89–1.78) in patients with PEA, and with higher overall survival (2.38% vs. 1.04%; OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.82–3.00) and neurologically intact survival (0.48% vs. 0.22%; OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.31–3.96) in those with asystole. Conclusions: Prehospital epinephrine administration by EMS is favorably associated with long-term neurological outcomes in patients with initial asystole and with long-term survival outcomes in those with PEA.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.