Effectiveness of pre-fire forest management on post-fire forest conditions in southeastern Arizona

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

BackgroundWestern forests in the United States are facing multiple threats that have the potential to permanently alter forest composition and structure. In particular, wildfire can either have beneficial or adverse effects on overall forest health and resilience. Monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of existing forest treatment plans for meeting forest management goals is becoming more critical to increase the capacity for managers to prepare for and accommodate uncertainty associated with changing disturbance regimes. We used a combination of fine-scale vegetation and microclimate surveys on 57 plots, active remotely sensed data (light detection and ranging: LiDAR), and high-resolution satellite imagery to evaluate the effectiveness of an existing management strategy to increase disturbance resistance and resilience of an isolated mixed-conifer forest following a recent large-scale wildfire in southeastern Arizona, USA. We specifically assessed the effectiveness of forest overstory live tree thinning treatments (silviculture) as well as understory fuel reduction treatments (fuel) for influencing post-fire abiotic and biotic conditions, reducing direct post-fire tree mortality, and increasing resilience as compared to untreated forest stands.ResultsWe found that forest silviculture and fuel reduction treatments implemented prior to a large wildfire had mixed results on post-fire fine-scale vegetation composition and structure, microclimate conditions, tree mortality, and tree resilience. Fine-scale vegetation characteristics within silviculture- and fuel-treated forest units displayed higher herbaceous diversity and decreased density of new tree snags as compared to untreated units post-fire. Relevant to seedling emergence, we found that variance in spring soil moisture content was lower overall in treated units; however, units that received overstory thinning (silviculture) treatments were also associated with higher average summer high soil temperatures as compared to untreated units. Additionally, direct tree mortality and rate of recovery of trees post-fire differed between two treatment types (silviculture and fuel reduction) when compared to untreated units and among contrasting levels of burn severity. Post-fire tree mortality and tree resilience did not differ between control and silviculture units; however, these characteristics did differ between control and fuel units. Unlike control units, probability of tree mortality changed little between burn severity categories in fuel treatments (53.4% of mortality occurring in unburned/low vs. 46.7% in moderate/high severity) and resilience increased an average of 2.04% for trees from unburned/low to moderate/high-severity burn categories.ConclusionsOur methodology could be applied to any forested system experiencing increasing intensity and frequency of wildfire. Our results indicate that post-fire forest conditions and resilience are influenced by forest management strategies, particularly fuel reduction treatments. To accommodate uncertainty associated with changing disturbance regimes and climate change, implementing post-fire and post-treatment assessments and monitoring as presented in this study will be essential for developing attainable goals and for maintaining desired forest conditions.