Abstract
Dear Editor, I read with interest the article Interface corrective force measurements in Boston brace treatment, by van den Hout, van Rhijn, van den Munckhof and van Ooy [3]. The authors, unable to find a correlation between the magnitude of force applied by the corrective brace pads and the degree of correction of the major (scoliotic) curve, draw the conclusion that apparently, the magnitude of the corrective force cannot explain the amount of correction achieved. However, the authors are confusing the quantity of pressure applied by the pads with the quality of the brace's corrective effect. To better understand the relationship between brace effects and the correction achieved, one must apply basic biomechanical principles of brace treatment. The Boston brace leads mainly to compressive effects; specifically, the frontal abdominal plate creates abdominal pressure [4]. Many patients wearing a Boston brace present with low correction effects coupled with the discomfort of abdominal complaints such as nausea. To achieve a good corrective effect, it is necessary to create an open expansion area in the space directly opposite to the pressure zone. This has the effect of lowering the pad pressure, but results in a much better correction as the spine is given room to derotate and elongate within the brace. Landauer [2] has clearly found that the two factors which lead to a positive end result are (1) the best possible correction effect (not the greatest possible pressure) and (2) patient compliance with brace wear. Therefore, we should not press our adolescent patients into uncomfortable orthoses with little correction effect when we have the means to apply a better corrective effect without undue discomfort. Under the latter circumstances, with the Cheneau brace (Fig. 1), we have demonstrated a significantly lower prevalence of surgery [5] than has been reported for the natural history of scoliosis [1], and for this reason we deem our, admittedly time-consuming and arduous, brace treatment to be a worthwhile endeavour. Fig. 1. Cheneau brace with pressure zones and the expansion areas opposite them in all three dimensions. This mode of construction promotes curvature corrections and eliminates compressive effects, which allows for greater wearer comfort while it produces ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.