Abstract

Melodic intonation therapy (MIT) positively impacts the speech function of patients suffering from aphasia and strokes. Fixed-pitch melodies and phrases formulated in MIT provide the key to the target language to open the language pathway. This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of music therapy-based MIT and speech therapy on patients with non-fluent aphasia. The former is more effective in the recovery of language function in patients with aphasia. Forty-two participants were enrolled in the study, and 40 patients were registered. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the intervention group (n = 20; 16 males, 4 females; 52.90 ± 9.08 years), which received MIT, and the control group (n = 20; 15 males, 5 females; 54.05 ± 10.81 years), which received speech therapy. The intervention group received MIT treatment for 30 min/day, five times a week for 8 weeks, and the control group received identical sessions of speech therapy for 30 min/day, five times a week for 8 weeks. Each participant of the group was assessed by a Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) at the baseline (t1, before the start of the experiment), and after 8 weeks (t2, the experiment was finished). The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) were also measured on the time points. The best medical care of the two groups is the same. Two-way ANOVA analysis of variance was used only for data detection. In the spontaneous speech (information), the listening comprehension (right or wrong, word recognition, and sequential order) and repetitions of the intervention group were significantly higher than the control group in terms of the cumulative effect of time and the difference between groups after 8 weeks. The intervention group has a significant time effect in fluency, but the results after 8 weeks were not significantly different from those in the control group. In terms of naming, the intervention group was much better than the control group in spontaneous naming. Regarding object naming, reaction naming, and sentence completing, the intervention group showed a strong time accumulation effect. Still, the results after 8 weeks were not significantly different from those in the control group. These results indicate that, compared with speech therapy, MIT based on music therapy is a more effective musical activity and is effective and valuable for the recovery of speech function in patients with non-fluent aphasia. As a more professional non-traumatic treatment method, MIT conducted by qualified music therapists requires deeper cooperation between doctors and music therapists to improve rehabilitating patients with aphasia. The Ethics Committee of the China Rehabilitation Research Center approved this study (Approval No. 2020-013-1 on April 1, 2020) and was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: Clinical Trials ChiCTR2000037871) on September 3, 2020.

Highlights

  • Stroke constitutes one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide (Benjamin et al, 2017)

  • Of the major neurological deficits, language function disorder is the main symptoms for stroke-related impairments, which are defined as aphasia in the clinic

  • Aphasia is part of the most common complications that occurred in one-third after stroke, about 21–38% of the patients are correlated with different degrees of symptoms in stroke survivors (Dickey et al, 2010)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stroke constitutes one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide (Benjamin et al, 2017). Of the major neurological deficits, language function disorder is the main symptoms for stroke-related impairments, which are defined as aphasia in the clinic. Aphasia is a kind of acquired loss or impairment of the ability to communicate by language following brain damage, which is usually in the left hemisphere (Wade et al, 1986). Non-fluent aphasia generally results from a stroke in the left frontotemporal regions and is characterized by slow, effortful speech (Meulen et al, 2016). It mainly presents an oral expression barrier, with relatively good comprehension, and difficulty in understanding grammatical words, order words, sentences, retelling, naming, reading, and writing in varying degrees (Fazio et al, 2009). Non-fluent aphasia mainly includes Broca’s aphasia, complete aphasia, and so on

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.