Abstract

BackgroundThe efficacy of antifungal therapy in fungal-associated severe asthma remains controversial.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the differences in the clinical presentation and response to antifungal therapy between severe asthmatics with fungal sensitization and positive fungal isolates.MethodsThis retrospective study included 73 patients with severe asthma from January 2004 to December 2017. We examined the presentation, medication, exacerbations, pulmonary function, serum IgE, blood eosinophils, and sputum culture results. Follow-up care was provided to each patient for minimum 3 years.ResultsWe classified the patients into four groups: group 1, neither fungal sensitization nor fungal isolates in the sputum (n=16); group 2, positive fungal sensitization (n=16); group 3, positive fungal isolates (n=31); and group 4, concomitant positive fungal sensitization and positive fungal isolates (n=10). There were four participants in group 2, 15 in group 3, and 6 in group 4 had received itraconazole therapy for 3 months. Patients in group 3 presented with lower serum IgE level than those in groups 2 and 4. Antifungal therapy significantly improved ACT score during the first year in groups 3 (from 18 [15–22] to 24 [23–24], p=0.0004) and resulted in a long-lasting ACT improvement till the third year in group 3 (from 18 [15–22] to 24 [22–24], p=0.0013).ConclusionAntifungal therapy could effectively control the symptoms in patients with severe asthma with positive fungal isolates, contrary to those with merely fungal sensitization; therefore, highlighting the need for a more precise treatment strategy in future for fungal-associated severe asthma.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.