Abstract

25Aug 2019 EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGH GRADE MAITLAND MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUE IN PATIENT WITH IDIOPATHIC ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS OF SHOULDER JOINT. A. K. M rezwan , Selim hossain , Ashraful alam , Azmol hossain , Mizanur Rahman and Samia Jannat. Lecturer- GonoBishwabidyalayNolam, Savar, Dhaka. Rehab specialist-Centre for disability in development,Ulail, Savar, Dhaka. Chief consultant-PT,Eastern care hospital ltd, Dhaka. Consultant and HOD ?PT,Nightingale Medical Collage hospital,Dhaka, iris 820. Student of Physiotherapy (BPT)GonoBishwabidyalay. Savar .Dhaka.

Highlights

  • History of trauma were (7.5%) and Diabetes Mellitus were (32.5%) of the respondent, this study found highly significant association between muscle deformity and types of pain (p ≤ 0.02)

  • Conventional physiotherapy techniques are more effective for improving pain and disability in patients with idiopathic adhesive

  • Hypothesis Null Hypothesis There is no significant improvement in effectiveness of high grade Maitland mobilization technique to reduce pain and restore movement in patient with adhesive capsulitis of shoulder

Read more

Summary

Objective

Keywords High Grade Maitland Mobilization, Conventional Physiotherapy Techniques, Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis, Visual analogue scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Methods: Total of 40 subjects diagnosed with idiopathic shoulder adhesive capsulitis were selected and randomly allocated into two groups. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Visual. Secondary level of education completed (35%) of respondents were more and people who are housewife they are mostly affected (40%) by this condition. Deformity level were very less just only 12.5% and Right shoulder is maximally affected (82.5%). History of trauma were (7.5%) and Diabetes Mellitus were (32.5%) of the respondent, this study found highly significant association between muscle deformity and types of pain (p ≤ 0.02). Study analysis the data within two groups and showed significant improvement of all the parameters, where between group comparisons revealed higher improvement in Group B compared to the Group A

Conclusion
4.45 After treatment
3.45 After Treatment
Group-B
3.45 Group-B
Findings
13.45 Group-B
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.