Abstract

Public communication campaigns are among the tools for promoting electricity saving. A crucial task in the process of creating a campaign is to design a simple message to effectively reach the average consumer. It is a beneficial practice to create alternative messages and pretest them to find the most effective. The research methodology during pretesting includes both quantitative and qualitative methods. However, it is believed that the outcomes obtained with the use of conventional techniques are not fully reliable. Therefore, the following question arises: What additional research methods should be applied at the stage of testing the message of a communication campaign so that its effectiveness can be assessed more reliably and/or improved even before its broadcast? In this study, we aim to present the possibility of applying cognitive neuroscience methods in conjunction with a questionnaire to experimentally check the effectiveness of the message using the example of selected electricity-saving communication campaigns. The key results of this study indicate that merging conscious and subconscious reactions to media messages allows us to gain new knowledge that can be used in the future to improve the communication campaign effectiveness. Our investigation showed the benefits that can be obtained by synergizing traditional research methods with neuroscientific approaches.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSaving electricity has an economic and ecological dimension

  • Academic Editor: DimitriosSaving electricity has an economic and ecological dimension

  • We aim to present the procedure of using the methods of cognitive neuroscience in conjunction with a questionnaire to experimentally check the effectiveness of the message on the example of selected electricity-saving communication campaigns

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Saving electricity has an economic and ecological dimension. It allows for a reduction in expenses incurred by electricity recipients. It means a lower consumption of energy resources and, less environmental damage resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels, which are still an important source of electricity. Obtaining electricity from fossil fuels releases enormous amounts of greenhouse gases and other pollutants into the atmosphere [3,4,5], not to mention destroying the landscape in vast spaces. In 2019, the energy sector was responsible for 77% of greenhouse gas emissions, followed by agriculture (11%), industrial processes and product use (9%), and waste management (3%) [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call