Abstract

Commercial sports drinks are used widely by athletes involved in high-intensity intermittent (HII) exercise. However, little has been reported on their relative effectiveness compared to simple homemade drink formulations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different sports drink formulations (commercial v homemade), water and no drink on fluid balance and exercise capacity during HII exercise. Twelve trained men (age: 27 ± 2.1 y) performed a 90-min HII running protocol designed to simulate activity experienced during a football match. The protocol was arranged in six 15-min stages where running speeds ranged between 55% and 120% of VO2max. The HII protocol included half-time and a run to fatigue post 90 min. Using a single-blind, randomized, cross-over design, participants ingested a preload of 5 ml⋅kg-1 10 min before HII exercise and 3 ml⋅kg-1 every 15 min of either Isostar® (ISO), a homemade sports drink (CHO), placebo (P) or no drink (ND). Blood lactate (Hla), blood glucose (Bgluc), heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured before, during (every 15 min) and after the 90-min HII protocol. Changes in plasma volume were measured at half-time and post 90 min. Sweat rate and fluid balance were calculated post each trial. Time to fatigue (TTF) was recorded at exhaustion. In the ND trial, TTF decreased by approximately 17%, 28% and 43% compared to P, CHO and ISO, respectively (p 0.05). No differences were noted in HLa, RPE, PV or SR between the trials (p>0.05) but there were significant effects of time (p<0.05). Bgluc peaked at 30 minutes in ISO and CHO, but dropped by ~27% in ISO and by ~30% in CHO after half time. Absence of fluid ingestion surprisingly had no significant effect on altering plasma volume or decreasing sweat rate despite causing noticeable decreases in exercise capacity. The homemade drink improved exercise capacity in a similar manner to that of the commercial drink, but neither sports drink achieved superior hydration compared to water. Ingestion of exogenous carbohydrate through sports drink consumption caused an exercise-induced glycemic response when exercise was restarted after half-time. This decline in blood glucose after half-time appears to be marginally attenuated in P trial. A possible suggestion for team sports could be to drink water rather than sports drink prior to half-time period.

Highlights

  • Much has been written about the physiological effects of ingesting sports drinks during prolonged exercise

  • Sports drinks provide exogenous carbohydrate that is quickly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract and acts to maintain optimal blood glucose levels, preventing hypoglycaemia while sparing endogenous carbohydrate stores [1]

  • heart rate (HR) was highest at 90 min of exercise during the no drink (ND) trial (179 ± 3.6 b⋅min-1) compared to P (171 ± 2.8 b⋅min-1), CHO (171 ± 3.2 b⋅min-1) and ISO (170 ± 4.1 b⋅min-1; p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Much has been written about the physiological effects of ingesting sports drinks during prolonged exercise. At present there are few published investigations available that have compared the differences or similarities of commercial versus basic sports drink formulations on exercise capacity during high intensity intermittent (HII) exercise lasting more than one hour. There is evidence to suggest that artificial colourings and preservatives in food and drink boost levels of hyperactivity in pre-school children [8]. These health risks may be negligible if sports drink consumption is low, it has been reported that elite athletes may consume up to 1L of commercial sports drinks per day [7]. There is limited information available on the relative effectiveness of homemade versus commercial energy drinks on physiological or performance measures

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call