Abstract
IntroductionAntimicrobial treatments for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) bacteremia are limited, with colistin-based regimens being a primary therapy. Ceftazidime–avibactam is an emerging treatment for various CRE infections. Our study aimed to assess ceftazidime–avibactam effectiveness compared with colistin in patients with CRE bacteremia. MethodsThis retrospective, multi-centre study included adult patients with CRE bacteremia treated with ceftazidime–avibactam or colistin, between September 1, 2017 and December 1, 2020, at two tertiary centres in Saudi Arabia. The risk of 14-day mortality was compared between recipients of ceftazidime–avibactam versus colistin, using Cox multivariable regression, adjusted for Pitt score, Charlson index score, and treatment with chemotherapy and immunosuppressive agents. ResultsIn total, 61 patients were enrolled; 32 received ceftazidime–avibactam, and 29 received colistin. The adjusted risk for 14-day mortality was lower in the ceftazidime–avibactam group than the colistin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10–0.99; p = 0.049), while the crude 14-day mortality did not differ between the two antibiotics (HR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.21–1.66; p = 0.32). The clinical success rate was higher with the use of ceftazidime–avibactam versus colistin (46.8% versus 20.4%, respectively; p = 0.047). ConclusionCeftazidime–avibactam was associated with a lower risk of 14-day mortality than colistin in patients with CRE bacteremia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.