Abstract

Many patients with cancer who would benefit from psychosocial care do not receive it. Implementation strategies may favor the integration of psychosocial care into practice and improve patient outcomes. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Humanization in Cancer Care (HuCare) Quality Improvement Strategy vs standard care as improvement of at least 1 of 2 domains (emotional or social function) of patient health-related quality of life at baseline and 3 months. A key secondary aim included investigation of the long-term effect. HuCare2 was a multicenter, incomplete, stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial, conducted from May 30, 2016, to August 28, 2019, in three 5-center clusters of cancer centers representative of hospital size and geographic location in Italy. The study was divided into 5 equally spaced epochs. Implementation sequence was defined by a blinded statistician; the nature of the intervention precluded blinding for clinical staff. Participants included consecutive adult outpatients with newly diagnosed cancer of any type and stage starting medical cancer treatment. The HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy comprised (1) clinician communication training, (2) on-site visits for context analysis and problem-solving, and (3) implementation of 6 evidence-based recommendations. The primary outcome was the difference between the means of changes of individual scores in emotional or social functions of health-related quality of life detected at baseline and 3-month follow-up (within each group) and during the postintervention epoch compared with control periods (between groups). Long-term effect of the intervention (at 12 months) was assessed as a secondary outcome. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. A total of 762 patients (475 [62.3%] women) were enrolled (400 HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy and 362 usual care); mean (SD) age was 61.4 (13.1) years. The HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved emotional function during treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22; P = .008) but not social function (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.09; P = .80). Effect on emotional function persisted at 12 months (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P = .04). In this trial, the HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved the emotional function aspect of health-related quality of life during cancer treatment and at 12 months, indicating a change in clinician behavior and in ward organization. These findings support the need for strategies to introduce psychosocial care; however, more research is needed on factors that may maximize the effects. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03008993.

Highlights

  • Individuals with cancer experience a wide range of psychosocial health needs, encompassing mental, emotional, social, and spiritual aspects of health.[1]

  • The Humanization in Cancer Care (HuCare) Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved emotional function during treatment but not social function (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.09; P = .80)

  • Effect on emotional function persisted at 12 months (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P = .04)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individuals with cancer experience a wide range of psychosocial health needs, encompassing mental, emotional, social, and spiritual aspects of health.[1] Frequent practical difficulties and information needs add to the cancer burden.[1,2] These problems are associated with a decline in quality of life over time and should be the target of comprehensive care.[3,4] To address these needs, a wide range of psychosocial interventions are available, including any activity aimed at ameliorating or reducing the influence of cancer on mental health and at improving patients' skills to cope with the demands of treatment and uncertainty of the disease outcome across the whole spectrum, from prediagnosis to palliative care and survivorship.[5]. Barriers to implementation may be related to personal characteristics of health care professionals, as well as to environmental and organizational factors.8,9Several of these barriers are modifiable,[8] using implementation strategies.[10,11,12] These strategies should be tailored to potential obstacles,[13] should be feasible, and should be effective.[14,15]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.