Abstract

BackgroundSmoking cessation is an achievable behavioral change, which reduces the risks of cardiovascular diseases, cancers and tobacco-related diseases. There is a need for an effective smoking cessation service for low and middle income country settings where the smoking rate is generally very high whilst a cessation service is not usually accessible. This study devised a new smoking cessation service package and assessed its effectiveness in the primary health care setting of northern Thailand.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial was centered at Maetha district hospital, Lampang province, Thailand, and its network of mobile non-communicable disease clinics at seven primary care units. A total of 319 eligible patients who consented to participate in the study, were randomly allocated to an intervention arm (160) and a control arm (159), applying block randomization. The multi-component intervention service consisted of:regular patient motivation by the same nurse over a 3-month period;a monthly piCO+ Smokerlyzer test for 3 months;continual assistance from a trained family member, using a smoking-cessation- diary; andoptional nicotine replacement chewing gum therapy.The control group received the routine service comprising of brief counseling and casual follow-up. Smoking cessation, confirmed by six months of abstinence and the piCo+ Smokerlyzer breath test, was compared between the two services after a year follow-up.The trial is registered as an international current control trial at the ISRCTN registry. ISRCTN89315117.ResultsThe median age of the participants was 64 years, with females constituting 28.84%. Most of the participants smoke hand-rolled cigarettes (85%). The intervention arm participants achieved a significantly higher smoking cessation rate than the control arm 25.62% vs 11.32%, with an adjusted odd ratio of 2.95 and 95% confidence interval 1.55–5.61.ConclusionIn relation to accessing smoking cessation services within the primary health care setting, participants who received the evidence-based intervention package were about three times more likely to succeed in giving up smoking than those who received the routine service. Utilizing community resources as major intervention components, the evidence from this trial may provide a useful and scalable smoking cessation intervention for low and middle income countries.Trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN89315117.WHO international clinical trial identifier number: U1111–1145-6916; 3/2013.

Highlights

  • Smoking cessation is an achievable behavioral change, which reduces the risks of cardiovascular diseases, cancers and tobacco-related diseases

  • The intervention arm participants achieved a significantly higher smoking cessation rate than the control arm 25.62% vs 11.32%, with an adjusted odd ratio of 2.95 and 95% confidence interval 1.55–5.61

  • In relation to accessing smoking cessation services within the primary health care setting, participants who received the evidence-based intervention package were about three times more likely to succeed in giving up smoking than those who received the routine service

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Smoking cessation is an achievable behavioral change, which reduces the risks of cardiovascular diseases, cancers and tobacco-related diseases. This study devised a new smoking cessation service package and assessed its effectiveness in the primary health care setting of northern Thailand. Smoking cessation is a global priority representing one of the most needed public health interventions in order to prevent millions of deaths and morbidity [1]. It is not a routinely accessible service in many low and middle income developing countries (LMIC) such as Thailand [2]. Despite scientific evidence indicating the benefits of smoking cessation methods, including brief advice, nurse counseling, motivational interviewing, and pharmacological treatment, such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), a number of social, cultural and health system factors challenge the integration of a smoking cessation service into primary health care settings [1]. Social support techniques such as family support and buddy-support, seem more feasible in terms of the availability of community resources

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call