Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate whether a hospital-wide infection control programme (ICP) is effective at reducing the burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and associated severe sepsis/septic shock or death (severe HAIs). MethodsProspective, quasi-experimental study with two surveillance periods (September 2011 to August 2012; May 2013 to August 2014). Starting October 2012, the ICP included hand hygiene promotion and bundle implementation for common HAIs. We applied segmented mixed-effects Poisson regression and multi-state models. We reported adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsOverall, 62 154 patients were under surveillance, with 1568 HAIs identified in 1170 patients (4.3 per 100 admissions) in the first and 2336 HAIs identified in 1711 patients (4.9 per 100 admissions) in the second surveillance period. No differences were found in the overall HAI incidence rates between the periods in the general wards (aIRR 1.29, 95% CI 0.78–2.15) and intensive care units (ICUs) (aIRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.27–1.31). However, the HAI incidence rate was declining in the ICUs after starting the ICP (aIRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–1.00 per 1-week increment), in contrast to general wards (aIRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.02). A reduction in severe HAIs (aIRR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05–0.32) and a lower probability of HAI-associated in-hospital deaths (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31–0.99) were observed in the second period in the ICUs. ConclusionsThere was no overall reduction in HAIs after implementation of the ICP. However, there was a significant reduction in severe HAIs in ICUs. Whether this difference was a consequence of the ICP or improvement in HAI case management is not clear.

Highlights

  • Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are among the leading complications in hospitalized patients, and they are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and excess costs [1,2]

  • 1568 HAIs were identified in 1170 patients (4.3 per 100 admissions) in the first surveillance period, and 2336 HAIs were identified in 1711 patients (4.9 per 100 admissions) in the second surveillance period

  • For the primary end point, we did not observe differences in the HAI incidence rates between the periods in the general wards and intensive care units (ICUs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are among the leading complications in hospitalized patients, and they are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and excess costs [1,2]. In a recent prevalence survey by Magill et al [3], 4% of inpatients in 183 US acute-care hospitals had at least one HAI. Increasing prevention efforts is imperative for decreasing this burden. It remains unclear whether hospital-wide infection control programmes (ICPs) aimed at a wide array of HAIs and organisms are more efficacious than control strategies targeting only specific hospital sectors, certain types of infections or specific pathogens [5]. The primary aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a hospital-wide ICP for reducing the overall burden of HAIs without targeting specific pathogens, types of HAIs or hospital wards. The secondary aim was to characterize the intervention effect on severe HAIs causing severe sepsis/septic shock or death

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call