Abstract

BackgroundA social mobilization (SM) initiative contributed to India’s success in polio elimination. This was the CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) India, a partner of the Uttar Pradesh (UP) SM Network and which continued its SM activities, even during the polio-free period through a network of multi-level social mobilizers. This paper assesses the effects of this community-level SM (CLSM) intervention on the extent of community engagement and performance of polio Supplementary Immunization Activity campaigns (SIAs) during the post-polio-endemic period (i.e., from March 2012 to September 2017).MethodsThis study followed a quasi-experimental design. We used secondary, cluster-level data from CGPP India’s Management Information System, including 52 SIAs held from January 2008 to September 2017, covering 56 blocks from 12 districts of UP. We computed various indicators and performed Generalized Estimating Equations based analysis to assess the statistical significance of differences between the outcomes of intervention and non-intervention areas. We then estimated the effects of the SM intervention using Interrupted time-series, Difference-in-Differences and Synthetic Control Methods. Finally, we estimated the population influenced by the intervention.ResultsThe performance of polio SIAs changed over time, with the intervention areas having better outcomes than non-intervention areas. The absence of CLSM intervention during the post-polio-endemic period would have negatively impacted the outcomes of polio SIAs. The percentage of children vaccinated at polio SIA booths, percentage of ‘X’ houses (i.e., households with unvaccinated children or households with out-of-home/out-of-village children or locked households) converted to ‘P’ (i.e., households with all vaccinated children or households without children eligible for vaccination), and percentage of resistant houses converted to polio acceptors would have gone down by 14.1 (Range: 12.7 to 15.5), 6.3 (Range: 5.2 to 7.3) and 7.4 percentage points, respectively. Community engagement would have reduced by 7.2 (Range: 6.6 to 7.7) percentage points.ConclusionsThe absence of CLSM intervention would have significantly decreased the level of community engagement and negatively impacted the performance of polio SIAs of the post-polio-endemic period. The study provides evidence of an added value of deploying additional human resource dedicated to social mobilization to achieve desired vaccination outcomes in hard-to-reach or programmatically challenging areas.

Highlights

  • A social mobilization (SM) initiative contributed to India’s success in polio elimination

  • The absence of community-level SM (CLSM) intervention would have significantly decreased the level of community engagement and negatively impacted the performance of polio Supplementary Immunization Activity (SIA) of the post-polio-endemic period

  • Reaching and converting about 424 (Range: 322 to 527) resistant households to polio accepters in each SIA from Community Mobilization Coordinators (CMC) areas (See Table 4) is a substantial achievement, as the study areas in the past experienced many instances where the snowball effect of one refusal family led to more refusals, and there were instances where entire communities were against the polio vaccination drive [6, 29, 30]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A social mobilization (SM) initiative contributed to India’s success in polio elimination. This was the CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) India, a partner of the Uttar Pradesh (UP) SM Network and which continued its SM activities, even during the polio-free period through a network of multi-level social mobilizers. Since its inception in 1998, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) created a significant infrastructure for disease surveillance, social mobilization (SM), and vaccine delivery; developed in-depth knowledge and expertise; and learned valuable lessons on reaching the most vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations on earth [5]. India followed the GPEI recommendations and applied different strategies to interrupt transmission, such as 1) High levels of routine immunization, 2) High-quality supplementary immunization activities (SIAs), and 3) Sensitive surveillance to identify areas of wild poliovirus transmission and to guide immunization activities [9]. India’s national polio eradication program averted millions of paralytic polio cases, hundred of thousands of polio deaths during the polio-endemic period and economically benefited the country [10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.