Effectiveness and Safety of the Double Intracervical Balloon vs Dinoprostone in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section.

Abstract

To compare effectiveness and safety of the Cook's balloon with vaginal dinoprostone to induce labor in patients with previous cesarean section. Observational, and retrospective study that included pregnant women at ≥ 37weeks' gestation, with unfavorable cervix, singleton pregnancy, intact membranes, and a previous cesarean section, who had undergone labor induction in the period 2014-2019. 170 patients (86 balloon-84 dinoprostone) were analyzed. The proportion of women achieving vaginal delivery within 24h was higher in the dinoprostone than in double-balloon group (RR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.36-7.72). No significant differences were detected in the first 48h in vaginal deliveries (P = .749) or in cesarean section rates (P = .634). Nor were there differences in maternal or fetal safety profiles. A body mass index > 35 increased the risk of cesarean section by 1.53 times (P = .017) and a Bishop's test score < 3 by 1.91 times (P = .009). A vaginal delivery following a cesarean section decreased the probability of another cesarean section by 0.46 times (P = .039). Labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone achieves better vaginal delivery rates in the first 24h vs Cook's balloon. While the difference in uterine rupture rate did not reach significance, this was higher in women receiving prostaglandin.