Abstract

The study of working memory capacity is of outmost importance in cognitive psychology as working memory is at the basis of general cognitive function. Although the working memory capacity limit has been thoroughly studied, its origin still remains a matter of strong debate. Only recently has the role of visual saliency in modulating working memory storage capacity been assessed experimentally and proved to provide valuable insights into working memory function. In the computational arena, attractor networks have successfully accounted for psychophysical and neurophysiological data in numerous working memory tasks given their ability to produce a sustained elevated firing rate during a delay period. Here we investigate the mechanisms underlying working memory capacity by means of a biophysically-realistic attractor network with spiking neurons while accounting for two recent experimental observations: 1) the presence of a visually salient item reduces the number of items that can be held in working memory, and 2) visually salient items are commonly kept in memory at the cost of not keeping as many non-salient items.Our model suggests that working memory capacity is determined by two fundamental processes: encoding of visual items into working memory and maintenance of the encoded items upon their removal from the visual display. While maintenance critically depends on the constraints that lateral inhibition imposes to the mnemonic activity, encoding is limited by the ability of the stimulated neural assemblies to reach a sufficiently high level of excitation, a process governed by the dynamics of competition and cooperation among neuronal pools. Encoding is therefore contingent upon the visual working memory task and has led us to introduce the concept of effective working memory capacity (eWMC) in contrast to the maximal upper capacity limit only reached under ideal conditions.

Highlights

  • General background and motivation Working memory (WM) provides temporary storage and manipulation of the information necessary for accomplishing complex cognitive tasks, and, as stated by Baddeley [1] it stands at the crossroads between memory, attention, and perception

  • Since the task consists of remembering as many objects as possible, such visual attention would be distributed among several objects and would only be modulated by the relative saliency of the salient item compared to the non-salient items

  • The results presented in this work are compatible with the existence of dynamic shifts of limited WM resources proposed by Bays and Husain [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

General background and motivation Working memory (WM) provides temporary storage and manipulation of the information necessary for accomplishing complex cognitive tasks, and, as stated by Baddeley [1] it stands at the crossroads between memory, attention, and perception. It is known that the human visual system is divided into object and spatial information processing pathways, and such distinction has been found in WM systems [3]. Throughout this study, we will focus on the study of visual object working memory and its capacity limits. Many studies support the view that visual WM shows strict upper limits of around 3–4 items [4], the lower limit in capacity varies depending on the participants and task parameters [5,6,7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.