Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD), characterized by a high concentration of heavy metals, poses a threat to the ecosystem and human health. Bioelectrochemical system (BES) is a promising technology for the simultaneous treatment of organic wastewater and recovery of metal ions from AMD. Different kinds of organic wastewater usually contain different predominant organic chemicals. However, the effect of different energy substrates on AMD treatment and microbial communities of BES remains largely unknown. Here, results showed that different energy substrates (such as glucose, acetate, ethanol, or lactate) affected the startup, maximum voltage output, power density, coulombic efficiency, and microbial communities of the microbial fuel cell (MFC). Compared with the maximum voltage output (55 mV) obtained by glucose-fed-MFC, much higher maximum voltage output (187 to 212 mV) was achieved by MFCs fed individually with other energy substrates. Acetate-fed-MFC showed the highest power density (195.07 mW/m2), followed by lactate (98.63 mW/m2), ethanol (52.02 mW/m2), and glucose (3.23 mW/m2). Microbial community analysis indicated that the microbial communities of anodic electroactive biofilms changed with different energy substrates. The unclassified_f_Enterobacteriaceae (87.48%) was predominant in glucose-fed-MFC, while Geobacter species only accounted for 0.63%. The genera of Methanobrevibacter (23.70%), Burkholderia-Paraburkholderia (23.47%), and Geobacter (11.90%) were the major genera enriched in the ethanol-fed-MFC. Geobacter was most predominant in MFC enriched by lactate (45.28%) or acetate (49.72%). Results showed that the abundance of exoelectrogens Geobacter species correlated to electricity-generation capacities of electroactive biofilms. Electroactive biofilms enriched with acetate, lactate, or ethanol effectively recovered all Cu2+ ion (349 mg/L) of simulated AMD in a cathodic chamber within 53 h by reduction as Cu0 on the cathode. However, only 34.65% of the total Cu2+ ion was removed in glucose-fed-MFC by precipitation with anions and cations rather than Cu0 on the cathode.

Highlights

  • Acid mine drainage (AMD) is one typical pollutant of water in many countries that have historic or current mining activities

  • The mechanism for copper removal on the surface of the cathode was explored. These results indicated that the effects of organic chemical on the enrichment of electroactive biofilm should be first evaluated in order to obtain an efficiently simultaneous treatment of organic wastewater and AMD

  • The taxonomy of Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) representative sequences was phylogenetically assigned to taxonomic classifications by the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier at the threshold of 70% for confidence based on the Bayesian algorithm [24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acid mine drainage (AMD) is one typical pollutant of water in many countries that have historic or current mining activities. In order to achieve the long-term environmental sustainability regarding mining activities, effective and efficient technologies that can tackle the remediation of AMD are highly required Alkaline neutralizing chemicals, such as limestone and slaked lime, are conventionally adopted to treat AMD by decreasing the extreme acidity and precipitating the dissolved various poisonous metals/metalloids as hydroxides [5]. The purposes of this study were to compare the impacts of four typical energy substrates on the performance, microbial communities, and capacities of AMD treatment of enriched electroactive biofilms. The mechanism for copper removal on the surface of the cathode was explored These results indicated that the effects of organic chemical (that is usually contained in organic wastewater) on the enrichment of electroactive biofilm should be first evaluated in order to obtain an efficiently simultaneous treatment of organic wastewater and AMD

Methods
Startup
Analysis and Calculations
Genomic DNA Extraction and MiSeq Sequencing of Bioelectroactive Biofilms
Effect of Different Energy Substrates on Single Chamber MFC Performance
Microbial Community of Anodic Bioelectroactive Biofilms
Morphologies of Electrode
Comparison of This Study with
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call