Abstract

Project-based organizations face significant challenges as they make decisions about staffing projects. Although staffing teams with members who have the appropriate expertise is important, managers also consider factors such as the amount of experience members have working with each other in the past (team familiarity). Additionally, companies are concerned with increasing the utilization of employee time, so managers assign employees to multiple concurrent projects (multiteaming) to reduce downtime and maximize use of expertise. However, questions exist as to how team familiarity and multiteaming contribute to project outcomes, particularly operational capabilities such as cost efficiency and quality. In this study, we present countervailing hypotheses and empirically examine how team familiarity and multiteaming influence the tradeoff between cost efficiency and quality. Results show that team familiarity mitigates the cost efficiency-quality tradeoff, allowing teams to attain both capabilities. In contrast, multiteaming increases the tradeoff between cost efficiency and quality such that teams are more likely to attain one or the other, but not both. In light of the findings, we provide staffing suggestions to practitioners for effective management of project teams.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.