Abstract

In the past decade, Public Rental Housing (PRH) has become the program of providing affordable rental housing to low- and middle-income households in China. Even though descriptions of the governance results are numerous, the previous studies are not underpinned by a theoretical foundation from a governance perspective, nor have they empirically examined whether PRH governance works on the ground. This explorative and empirical paper aims to fill this gap of an outcome-oriented evaluation of the impacts of governance as perceived by the final user. Central government formulated the objective for PRH governance as maintaining stability in the society. Whether the tenants perceive the goal of social stability as achieved was measured along three governance outcome dimensions: satisfaction with housing quality, satisfaction with housing quantity, and willingness to communicate with the government about PRH governance. Data were collected from questionnaires to PRH-tenants in Chongqing, the most important pilot city of PRH provision in China. The findings show that the perceived governance outcomes were quite mixed as tenants were moderately satisfied with PRH housing quantity, but less satisfied with housing quality, and thought they could relatively easily communicate with local government. In view of these mixed outcomes, to strengthen the effectiveness of PRH governance in the eyes of the tenants, this study suggests local governments: (1) to rethink and redevelop the performance evaluation; (2) to rethink the relations with non-governmental actors and organise a monitoring system that will assist in optimizing housing quality; and (3) to facilitate tenants’ communication with local government.

Highlights

  • Public Rental Housing (PRH) has become an important program of rental housing provision at regulated rents to low-and middle-income households in urban China since 2010

  • The previous studies have not empirically examined whether PRH governance works on the ground

  • The majority (35.4%) tenants had a family of three persons, which is quite usual in China. 10.2% and 17.0% of the respondents reported their monthly income per person and household monthly income per person higher than 5000 yuan (US$740), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Public Rental Housing (PRH) has become an important program of rental housing provision at regulated rents to low-and middle-income households in urban China since 2010. The central government sets policies and mandates for the whole country’s PRH provision, while local governments are in charge of the local policy formulation and implementation (Zhou & Ronald, 2017a). Central government only provide a small proportion of funds needed for the realization of PRH provision. As local governments turn to non-governmental actors for finance (Zou, 2014), the governance of PRH has changed profoundly in the last decade (Ministry of Finance [MoF], 2015; Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development [MOHURD], 2018; Shi et al, 2016). One decade of PRH governance development has achieved mixed results. Scholars argue that the involved non-governmental actors do not find their role attractive, which can lead to unsustainable development of the governance (see for example, Huang, 2015; Lin, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call