Effective Prophylaxis for Deep Vein Thrombosis After Stroke

Abstract

HomeStrokeVol. 35, No. 12Effective Prophylaxis for Deep Vein Thrombosis After Stroke Free AccessArticle CommentaryPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessArticle CommentaryPDF/EPUBEffective Prophylaxis for Deep Vein Thrombosis After StrokeLow-Dose Anticoagulation Rather Than Stockings Alone: Against Martin S. Dennis, MD Martin S. DennisMartin S. Dennis From the Neuroscience Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospitals NHS Trust, Edinburgh, UK. Search for more papers by this author Originally published28 Oct 2004https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000147721.75537.efStroke. 2004;35:2912–2913Other version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: October 28, 2004: Previous Version 1 Approximately 5% of hospitalized stroke patients have a clinically apparent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and ≈2% will have a pulmonary embolus (PE) confirmed.1 However, prospective studies that systematically screen for DVT with, for example compression Doppler ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, identified DVT in up to 50% of patients.2 Some patients who are breathless because of aspiration pneumonia, chest infection, or heart failure may actually have had an undiagnosed pulmonary embolus. Autopsies often identify clinically unrecognized PEs that probably contributed to the patient’s death. Therefore, it seems sensible to offer patients prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism. However, a brief discussion with colleagues is likely to reveal wide variation in the approaches taken to prophylaxis.In our unit, we aim to treat all patients with ischemic stroke with aspirin within 48 hours, because this has been shown to improve long-term outcomes and probably also reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism to some extent.3 In addition, we try to ensure that patients are adequately hydrated and mobilized as early as possible. These interventions will, we hope, reduce other complications as well, although we acknowledge the lack of direct evidence for the benefits of either of these interventions.We reserve low-dose subcutaneous heparin (5000 U twice daily) for a small number of carefully selected patients. The systematic reviews of all the randomized controlled trials of heparin in acute ischemic stroke suggest that although heparin is likely to substantially reduce the risk of both DVT (at least that detected on isotope labeled fibrinogen) and of PE, it does not, on average, improve patients’ survival or their functional outcome.4 Any reduction in venous thromboembolism, and early recurrent cerebral ischemic events, appears to be completely offset by an increase in hemorrhagic complications (the most disabling being symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage). Thus, we only use heparin for DVT prevention in selected patients who we believe have a much greater than average risk for venous thromboembolism and a less than average risk for hemorrhagic complications. The criteria we use are based on “common sense” rather than hard evidence, which does not exist. Thus, we would consider low-dose heparin in an obese stroke patient with severe leg weakness and a history of previous venous thromboembolism, known disseminated malignancy, or some other prothrombotic state. We would avoid heparin in those with larger cerebral infarcts but would be less worried in patients with a lacunar infarct in which hemorrhagic transformation appears to be unusual. Today, we might, rightly or wrongly, avoid heparin if gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging has shown microhemorrhages.Far more controversial than the use of heparin in our view is the assumption made in the title of this “controversy” that stockings should represent the standard approach. We currently do not routinely apply graduated compression stockings (GCS) to the legs of immobile stroke patients because we are uncertain that they are of net benefit. We do not believe that the available evidence is sufficient to justify their routine use.The evidence that GCS stockings prevent DVT comes from meta analyses of ≈19 small randomized control trials, which together suggest that they reduce the risk of DVT by approximately two-thirds.5,6 However, 17 of these trials were in surgical patients. In surgical patients, unlike those with stroke, GCS can be applied before the onset of paralysis; paralysis is usually brief and mobilization rapid. In patients with peripheral arterial disease, diabetes, and peripheral neuropathy (which are more common in stroke than the average surgical patient), GCS can cause skin necrosis, which may even lead to amputation. They have other less serious but nonetheless important disadvantages. Stroke patients, and especially those with urinary incontinence, find GCS uncomfortable. GCS are time-consuming to apply and monitor properly and the time nurses spend on this activity might be better spent in other ways if GCS are not effective. Only one randomized control trial has tested stockings in stroke patients, and this was far too small to provide a reliable estimate of effect.6,7 Interestingly, although below-knee GCS are used, almost all the trial evidence is based on the full-length variety.We enroll our patients in the CLOTS (Clots in Legs Or TEDS after Stroke) Trial, which is a family of 2 multicenter international randomized control trials funded by the UK Medical Research Council (www.clotstrial.com). Trial 1 aims to establish whether full-length GCS reduce the risk of DVT after stroke, and trial 2 aims to establish if full-length stockings are more effective than below-knee GCS. In the CLOTS trial, some patients get stockings and others avoid them, but all benefit from routine noninvasive screening for DVT, and thus the possibility of early treatment for occult DVT. We reckon this is the best management we can offer at this time.FootnotesCorrespondence to Dr Martin S. Dennis, University of Edinburgh, Neuroscience Trials Unit, Bramwell Dott Building, Western General Hospitals NHS Trust, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, UK. E-mail [email protected]References1 Davenport RJ, Dennis MS, Wellwood I, Warlow CP. Complications following acute stroke. Stroke. 1996; 27: 415–420.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Kelly J, Rudd A,. Lewis R, Hunt B. J. Venous thromboembolism after acute stroke. Stroke. 2001; 32: 262–267.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Sandercock P, Gubitz G, Foley P, Counsell C. Antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke (Cochrane Methodology Review). In: The Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003: 4.Google Scholar4 Gubitz G, Counsell C, Sandercock P, Signorini D. Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke (Cochrane Methodology Review). In: The Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003: 4.Google Scholar5 Wells PS, Lensing AWA, Hirsh J. Graduated compression stockings in the prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154: 67–72.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Muir KW, Watt A, Baxter G, Grosset DG, Lees KR. Randomised trial of graded compression stockings for prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after acute stroke. Q J Med. 2000; 93: 359–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar7 Mazzone C, Chiodo Grandi F, Sandercock P, Miccio M, Salvi R. Physical methods for preventing deep vein thrombosis in stroke (Cochrane Methodology Review). In: The Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003: 4.Google Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Watabe N, Fujii Y, Arai S and Konda R (2014) Evaluation of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Acute Stroke, Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery, 10.7887/jcns.23.59, 23:1, (59-63), . Diedler J, Sykora M, Herweh C, Orakcioglu B, Zweckberger K, Steiner T and Hacke W (2011) Intensivmedizinische Versorgung von Patienten mit intrazerebraler BlutungIntensive medical care of patients with intracerebral hemorrhaging, Der Nervenarzt, 10.1007/s00115-010-3072-y, 82:4, (431-446), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011. Steiner T, Kaste M, Forsting M, Mendelow D, Kwiecinski H, Szikora I, Juvela S, Marchel A, Chapot R, Cognard C, Unterberg A and Hacke W (2011) Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage European Handbook of Neurological Management, 10.1002/9781444346268.ch18, (253-277) Goldstein J, Fazen L, Wendell L, Chang Y, Rost N, Snider R, Schwab K, Chanderraj R, Kabrhel C, Kinnecom C, FitzMaurice E, Smith E, Greenberg S and Rosand J (2008) Risk of Thromboembolism Following Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Neurocritical Care, 10.1007/s12028-008-9134-3, 10:1, (28-34), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2009. Orken D, Kenangil G, Ozkurt H, Guner C, Gundogdu L, Basak M and Forta H (2009) Prevention of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage, The Neurologist, 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181a93bac, 15:6, (329-331), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009. (2009) Acute treatment of major stroke: general principles Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke, 10.1017/CBO9780511575815.021, (250-256) Ogata T, Yasaka M, Wakugawa Y, Inoue T, Ibayashi S and Okada Y (2009) Does elastic stocking prevent deep venous thrombosis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage?, Nosotchu, 10.3995/jstroke.31.10, 31:1, (10-14), . (2009) Treatment of transient ischemic attack and stroke Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke, 10.1017/CBO9780511575815.019, (223-284) Adams H, del Zoppo G, Alberts M, Bhatt D, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb R, Higashida R, Jauch E, Kidwell C, Lyden P, Morgenstern L, Qureshi A, Rosenwasser R, Scott P and Wijdicks E (2007) Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke, Stroke, 38:5, (1655-1711), Online publication date: 1-May-2007. Jüttler E and Steiner T (2014) Treatment and prevention of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of EUSI and AHA/ASA recommendations, Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 10.1586/14737175.7.10.1401, 7:10, (1401-1416), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2007. Kamphuisen P and Agnelli G (2007) What is the optimal pharmacological prophylaxis for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with acute ischemic stroke?, Thrombosis Research, 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.03.010, 119:3, (265-274), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007. (2007) Acute Ischemic Stroke Wiley Handbook of Current and Emerging Drug Therapies, 10.1002/9780470041000.cedt059, Online publication date: 15-Oct-2007. André C, de Freitas G and Fukujima M (2007) Prevention of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following stroke: a systematic review of published articles, European Journal of Neurology, 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01536.x, 14:1, (21-32), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007. Külkens S, Ringleb P, Diedler J, Hacke W and Steiner T (2006) Empfehlungen der European Stroke Initiative für Diagnose und Behandlung spontaner intrazerebraler BlutungenRecommendations of the European Stroke Initiative for the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, Der Nervenarzt, 10.1007/s00115-006-2126-7, 77:8, (970-988), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006. Zorowitz R, Smout R, Gassaway J and Horn S (2015) Prophylaxis for and Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis After Stroke: The Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP), Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10.1310/9DQM-JTGL-WHAA-XYBW, 12:4, (1-10), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005. December 2004Vol 35, Issue 12 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000147721.75537.efPMID: 15514184 Manuscript receivedJuly 19, 2004Manuscript acceptedSeptember 29, 2004Originally publishedOctober 28, 2004 Keywordsdeep vein thrombosisstrokeheparinpulmonary embolismPDF download Advertisement