Abstract

Census population size, sex-ratio and female reproductive success were monitored in 10 laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for different ages of reproduction. With this demographic information, we estimated eigenvalue, variance and probability of allele loss effective population sizes. We conclude that estimates of effective size based on genefrequency change at a few loci are biased downwards. We analysed the relative roles of selection and genetic drift in maintaining genetic variation in laboratory populations of Drosophila. We suggest that rare, favourable genetic variants in our laboratory populations have a high chance of being lost if their fitness effect is weak, e.g. 1% or less. However, if the fitness effect of this variation is 10% or greater, these rare variants are likely to increase to high frequency. The demographic information developed in this study suggests that some of our laboratory populations harbour more genetic variation than expected. One explanation for this finding is that part of the genetic variation in these outbred laboratory Drosophila populations may be maintained by some form of balancing selection. We suggest that, unlike bacteria, medium-term adaptation of laboratory populations of fruit flies is not primarily driven by new mutations, but rather by changes in the frequency of preexisting alleles.

Highlights

  • A comprehensive understanding of evolution in either laboratory or natural populations requires analysis of the impact of both natural selection and random genetic drift on evolutionary trajectories

  • A rigorous assessment of these claims would require a detailed assessment of the force of random genetic drift in such populations, which can only be accomplished with some estimate of their effective population sizes

  • A major goal of the present study is to investigate the impact of genetic drift on the evolution of Mendelian laboratory populations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A comprehensive understanding of evolution in either laboratory or natural populations requires analysis of the impact of both natural selection and random genetic drift on evolutionary trajectories. Experimental evolution studies in the laboratory can create conditions that lead to very strong natural selection under controlled environmental conditions, often in moderate sized populations, yielding systems conducive to the study of how drift and selection interact in the course of adaptive evolution These critiques have claimed that the methods used for maintaining these laboratory populations will permit the increase of deleterious mutations that compromise the value of these populations for the study of adaptation by natural selection. A rigorous assessment of these claims would require a detailed assessment of the force of random genetic drift in such populations, which can only be accomplished with some estimate of their effective population sizes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.