Abstract

We construct an inspiral-merger-ringdown eccentric gravitational-wave (GW) model for binary black holes with non-precessing spins within the effective-one-body formalism. This waveform model, SEOBNRv4EHM, extends the accurate quasi-circular SEOBNRv4HM model to eccentric binaries by including recently computed eccentric corrections up to 2PN order in the gravitational waveform modes, notably the $(l,|m|)=(2,2),(2,1),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5)$ multipoles. The waveform model reproduces the zero eccentricity limit with an accuracy comparable to the underlying quasi-circular model, with the unfaithfulness of $\lesssim1\%$ against quasi-circular numerical-relativity (NR) simulations. When compared against 28 public eccentric NR simulations from the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes catalog with initial orbital eccentricities up to $e\simeq0.3$ and dimensionless spin magnitudes up to $+0.7$, the model provides unfaithfulness $<1\%$, showing that both the $(2,|2|)$-modes and the higher-order modes are reliably described without calibration to NR datasets in the eccentric sector. The waveform model SEOBNRv4EHM is able to qualitatively reproduce the phenomenology of dynamical captures, and can be extended to include spin-precession effects. It can be employed for upcoming observing runs with the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detectors and used to re-analyze existing GW catalogs to infer the eccentricity parameters for binaries with $e\lesssim0.3$ (at 20 Hz or lower) and spins up to $\lesssim 0.9-0.95$. The latter is a promising region of the parameter space where some astrophysical formation scenarios of binaries predict mild eccentricity in the ground-based detectors' bandwidth. Assessing the accuracy and robustness of the eccentric waveform model SEOBNRv4EHM for larger eccentricities and spins will require comparisons with, and, likely, calibration to eccentric NR waveforms in a larger region of the parameter space.

Highlights

  • Most inspiraling binaries observed by ground-based gravitational-wave (GW) detectors are likely to form via isolated binary evolution [1–14] and are expected to circularize [15] by the time they enter the detector frequency band

  • We develop a multipolar eccentric EOB waveform model that builds on the quasicircular SEOBNRv4HM model [134] for binary black holes (BBHs) with aligned spins1 and includes recently derived eccentric corrections up to 2PN order [126], including spin-orbit and spin-spin interactions, in the ðl; jmjÞ 1⁄4 ð2; 2Þ; ð2; 1Þ; ð3; 3Þ; ð4; 4Þ; ð5; 5Þ multipoles

  • Since the goal of this paper is to develop an eccentric waveform model that reduces to the SEOBNRv4HM model in the quasicircular limit and is faithful to the current Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) NR eccentric waveforms, we choose to retain the conservative and dissipative dynamics of the SEOBNRv4HM model and introduce the eccentric corrections of Ref. [126] only in the gravitational modes

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Most inspiraling binaries observed by ground-based gravitational-wave (GW) detectors are likely to form via isolated binary evolution [1–14] and are expected to circularize [15] by the time they enter the detector frequency band. We develop a multipolar eccentric EOB waveform model that builds on the quasicircular SEOBNRv4HM model [134] for BBHs with aligned spins and includes recently derived eccentric corrections up to 2PN order [126], including spin-orbit and spin-spin interactions, in the ðl; jmjÞ 1⁄4 ð2; 2Þ; ð2; 1Þ; ð3; 3Þ; ð4; 4Þ; ð5; 5Þ multipoles. This eccentric waveform model, SEOBNRv4EHM, has comparable accuracy to the quasicircular SEOBNRv4HM model in the zero eccentricity limit when compared to quasicircular NR waveforms, and produces unfaithfulness

ECCENTRIC EFFECTIVE-ONE-BODY WAVEFORM MODEL
Effective-one-body dynamics
Effective-one-body gravitational waveforms
Eccentric initial conditions
PERFORMANCE OF THE MULTIPOLAR ECCENTRIC EFFECTIVE-ONE-BODY WAVEFORM MODEL
Faithfulness function
Comparison against quasicircular numerical-relativity waveforms
Comparison against eccentric numerical-relativity waveforms
Robustness of the model across parameter space
Unfaithfulness between eccentric and quasicircular waveforms
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call