Abstract

As brands increasingly engage in activism, it is critical they communicate messages that their target audiences perceive as authentic to reinforce their consumer-brand relationships. This study investigates the effect of type of commitment (financial, non-financial, or rhetorical) and message framing (hope or frustration) on perceived brand authenticity and brand love. It additionally explores how these relationships vary depending on a brand’s level of equity. Through one exploratory and five experimental studies the most effective type of messaging for high and low equity brands is identified. Whereas high equity brands should communicate a financial commitment to gain authenticity and love, low equity brands should emphasize a non-financial commitment. In general, brands must convey hope rather than frustration in their messages. However, brands should convey frustration when communicating a rhetorical commitment to a cause. This study contributes to the brand activism and brand equity literature and provides specific marketing strategy recommendations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.