Abstract
In the analysis and design of steel–concrete composite girders of a bridge, deflections, stresses, and strengths are typically obtained from elementary beam bending theory by utilizing the effective flange width concept. Shear lag effects are accounted for indirectly, by replacing the actual slab width by an appropriate reduced “effective” width. Besides the exact numerical values that can be given by numerical analysis of a bridge, it is necessary that code provisions should provide simplified practical method of evaluation of effective flange width without significant loss of accuracy. So each code implements different ideas and approaches for specifying effective flange width. Comparing them highlights distinct philosophies underlying the various effective width code formulations, which is the main objective of this paper. In this paper, the effective flange width provisions in the US, Britain, Canada, Japan, and European Committee are presented and compared. Characteristics of each provision are briefly described and summarized. Numerical comparisons for simply-supported spans and negative moment regions of continuous spans follow. The paper concludes with a summary outlining the commonalities and main differences among all these provisions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
