Abstract

This study compares experimentally obtained hardened cement paste microstructures from μCT and virtual microstructures generated by two hydration models, namely CEMHYD3D and HYMOSTRUC. Several microstructural features (phase volume fractions, connectivity, pore size distribution, and two-point correlation functions) were cross-validated among the microstructures on the basis of image analysis. In addition, the corresponding effective diffusivities in a fully saturated state were compared. The simulated effective diffusivities of the μCT and CEMHYD3D microstructures agree well with the experimental data, where HYMOSTRUC overestimates. However, none of the virtual microstructures can fully capture the actual microstructural features. HYMOSTRUC produces realistic pore size distributions but overly connected capillary pores, whereas CEMHYD3D generates excessive scattering of small pores with low connectivity. The impact of the differences in the pore structure on the output diffusivity is presented.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call