Abstract

Research questionCan specimen types (cells versus tissues) and additive cryoprotectant agents contribute to efficient cryopreservation of primate spermatogonial stem cells (SSC)? DesignTesticular tissues or cells from four prepubertal monkeys were used in this study. The freezing efficacy of testicular tissue was compared with cell suspensions using conventional freezing media (1.4 mol/l dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) and the efficacy of cryoprotectant additives (1.4 mol/l DMSO combined with trehalose 200 mmol/l, hypotaurine 14 mmol/l, necrostatin-1 50 µmol/l or melatonin 100 µmol/l) was evaluated in testicular tissue freezing. ResultsThe survival rate (46.0 ± 4.8% versus 33.7 ± 6.0%; P = 0.0286) and number of recovered cells (5.0 ± 1.5 × 106 cells/g versus 0.7 ± 0.8 × 106 cells/g; P = 0.0286) were significantly higher in frozen tissues than in frozen cell suspensions. After tissue freezing, a higher number of recovered PGP9.5+ cells were observed with 200 mmol/l trehalose treatment than in DMSO controls (2.4 ± 0.6 × 106 cells/g versus 1.1 ± 0.3 × 106 cells/g; P = 0.0164). Normal establishment of donor-derived colony was observed in SSC after tissue freezing with 200 mmol/l trehalose. ConclusionsTesticular tissue freezing is more effective than single cell suspension freezing for higher recovery of undifferentiated spermatogonia. Moreover, it was verified that slow freezing using 200 mmol/l trehalose, 1.4 mol/l DMSO and 10% KnockOut™ Serum Replacement in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline is an effective cryopreservation protocol for primate testicular tissue.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call