Abstract

BackgroundA better understanding of the neural changes associated with paresis in stroke patients could have important implications for therapeutic approaches. Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is commonly used for analyzing effective connectivity patterns of brain networks due to its significant property of modeling neural states behind fMRI signals. We applied this technique to analyze the differences between motor networks (MNW) activated by continuous passive movement (CPM) of paretic and non-paretic ankles in subacute stroke patients. This study aimed to identify CPM induced connectivity characteristics of the primary sensory area (S1) and the differences in extrinsic directed connections of the MNW and to explain the hemodynamic differences of brain regions of MNW.MethodsFor the network analysis, we used ten stroke patients’ task fMRI data collected under CPMs of both ankles. Regions for the MNW, the primary motor cortex (M1), the premotor cortex (PM), the supplementary motor area (SMA) and the S1 were defined in a data-driven way, by independent component analysis. For the network analysis of both CPMs, we compared twelve models organized into two model-families, depending on the S1 connections and input stimulus modeling. Using DCM, we evaluated the extrinsic connectivity strengths and hemodynamic parameters of both stimulations of all patients.ResultsAfter a statistical comparison of the extrinsic connections and their modulations of the “best model”, we concluded that three contralateral self-inhibitions (cM1, cS1 and cSMA), one contralateral inter-regional connection (cSMA→cM1), and one interhemispheric connection (cM1→iM1) were significantly different. Our research shows that hemodynamic parameters can be estimated with the Balloon model using DCM but the parameters do not change with stroke.ConclusionsOur results confirm that the DCM-based connectivity analyses combined with Bayesian model selection may be a useful technique for quantifying the alteration or differences in the characteristics of the motor network in subacute stage stroke patients and in determining the degree of MNW changes.

Highlights

  • Numerous studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate neural reorganization and functional recovery after stroke (Calautti et al, 2007). fMRI univariate analysis of regional activation is valuable for understanding the regional neural substrates associated with cognitive functions (Ma et al, 2015)

  • Our study investigates whether the impairment of cerebral hemodynamics in subacute stroke patients is related to changes in the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal hemodynamic response function (HRF)

  • We examined the hemodynamic parameters in subacute stroke patients calculated by the Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) of the winning model for statistical analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate neural reorganization and functional recovery after stroke (Calautti et al, 2007). fMRI univariate analysis of regional activation is valuable for understanding the regional neural substrates associated with cognitive functions (Ma et al, 2015). The role of the SMA is planning movement, but this is an essential brain area that is activated even when the motion is not performed but only being thought about (Tanji & Shima, 1994) These regions create the motor network (Biswal et al, 1995) which is primarily responsible for conducting and controlling a wide variety of movements (Lam et al, 2018). Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is commonly used for analyzing effective connectivity patterns of brain networks due to its significant property of modeling neural states behind fMRI signals. We applied this technique to analyze the differences between motor networks (MNW) activated by continuous passive movement (CPM) of paretic and non-paretic ankles in subacute stroke patients. Our research shows that hemodynamic parameters can be estimated with the Balloon model using DCM but the parameters do not change with stroke

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call