Abstract

OBJECTIVES. To establish whether an experienced endocrinologist could screen accurately for diabetic retinopathy using mydriatic 60 degree fundus photographs compared with a reference standard, viz. the combined highest scores of two experienced ophthalmologists. Retrospective review of 60 degree colour transparency photographs taken over a 6-year period. Retinopathy was graded in a standardised way. Patients attending the diabetic clinic at Johannesburg Hospital, South Africa. Fifteen hundred and seventeen patients (2446 eyes) formed the basis for the study. Patients were included if there was more than 50% readability of the fundus photographs. Outcome measures were prevalence of any retinopathy and presence of referable (severe) retinopathy. Interobserver agreement was measured using the kappa statistic, and sensitivity and specificity of the screener were evaluated. The prevalence of retinopathy at the clinic was approximately 30%, but only about 12% was severe enough to warrant referral to the ophthalmology outpatient department. The endocrinologist was very accurate in determining cases requiring referral; there was 97% agreement with the reference standard, viz. the combined highest score of two experienced ophthalmologists (gold standard). Correlation on the determination of any retinopathy was less accurate (80% agreement), mostly owing to the endocrinologist reporting more isolated microaneurysms than the ophthalmologists. The screening method used gave a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 99% which are within recommended standards. The screening strategy using a mydriatic fundus camera at the diabetic clinic was found to be effective and accurate and greatly reduced the number of possible referrals to the ophthalmology outpatient department.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.