Abstract

This article addresses the sample invariant properties of five anchor test equating methods (Tucker and Levine equally reliable linear equating, chained equipercentile, frequency estimation equipercentile equating, and three-parameter item response theory true-score equating). Equating results across two sampling conditions, representative sampling and new-form matched sampling, were compared to determine which equating procedures produced the most consistent results. In the representative sample condition, equatings were based on old-form and new-form samples that differed in ability; in the new-form matched sample condition, the old-form sample was selected to match the anchor test score distribution of the new-form sample. Results for the item response theory equating method differed for representative and matched samples, as did the equating results for the Levine and chained equipercentile methods. Results based on the Tucker observed- score equating method and frequency estimation equipercentile equ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.