Abstract

Translucent zirconia, manufactured by increasing the yttria content, offers improved translucency, but may have a negative effect on esthetic outcomes under clinical conditions such as discolored abutment because of the reflection of the underlying color. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the translucency parameter and masking ability of 3 mol % yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP (Katana HT)), 4Y-ZP (Katana STML), and 5Y-ZP (Katana UTML) with those of lithium disilicate (Rosetta SM). Zirconia and lithium disilicate specimens of 10 mm diameters and 0.8 and 1.5 mm thicknesses were fabricated. Their CIE L*a*b* values (L*, brightness; a*, red-green value; b*, yellow-blue value) were measured at the center of the specimens against black and white backgrounds using a spectrophotometer, and translucency parameter (TP) values were determined. The microstructure of the specimens was observed using scanning electron microscopy. Four cylindrical backgrounds of different shades were prepared. The zirconia and lithium disilicate specimens were placed on the backgrounds without any intervening medium. CIE L*a*b* values were obtained, and the color difference value (ΔE) was calculated. Thresholds for acceptability and perceptibility were assumed as ΔE = 5.5 and ΔE = 2.6, respectively, to evaluate masking ability. Data were compared using one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc was performed using Scheffe’s test (α = 0.05). In zirconia specimens, the TP value increased as the yttria content increased from 3 mol %, through 4 mol % to 5 mol %, and all zirconia specimens showed lower TP values than lithium disilicate specimens did. All zirconia specimens showed optimal masking ability against a normal dentin shade (ND3) and acceptable masking ability against titanium at a minimum thickness of 1.5 mm. However, no zirconia specimen could mask severely discolored dentin (ND9), regardless of thickness. The decrease in zirconia thickness from 1.5 to 0.8 mm significantly increased translucency. Monolithic Y-TZP ceramics could mask a normal dentin background but could not mask severely discolored dentin at either 0.8 or 1.5 mm thicknesses.

Highlights

  • Zirconia is a bioinert and biocompatible material with high mechanical strength, good chemical stability, and low thermal conductivity [1,2,3,4]

  • For stable use of zirconia in dentistry, 3 mol % yttria is added to stabilize the tetragonal phase of zirconia at room temperature [5,6]

  • Materials 2020, 13, 4726 yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP) responds to crack formation by transformation toughening, which results in high fracture toughness [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Zirconia is a bioinert and biocompatible material with high mechanical strength, good chemical stability, and low thermal conductivity [1,2,3,4]. Despite its excellent mechanical properties, the opaque nature of 3Y-TZP is its significant disadvantage. This esthetic deficiency has conventionally been managed by the use of a layer of powder-fire porcelain on a zirconia core, but bilayered structures are vulnerable to chipping and delamination, exacerbated by thermally induced residual stresses [6]. Attempts to minimize this vulnerability have been made by milling the veneer and the framework separately and joining them with either resin luting agents or fusion firing.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call