Abstract

SummaryBackgroundFindings from randomised trials have shown a higher early risk of stroke after carotid artery stenting than after carotid endarterectomy. We assessed whether white-matter lesions affect the perioperative risk of stroke in patients treated with carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.MethodsPatients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis included in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) were randomly allocated to receive carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. Copies of baseline brain imaging were analysed by two investigators, who were masked to treatment, for the severity of white-matter lesions using the age-related white-matter changes (ARWMC) score. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated sequence (1:1). Patients were divided into two groups using the median ARWMC. We analysed the risk of stroke within 30 days of revascularisation using a per-protocol analysis. ICSS is registered with controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN 25337470.Findings1036 patients (536 randomly allocated to carotid artery stenting, 500 to carotid endarterectomy) had baseline imaging available. Median ARWMC score was 7, and patients were dichotomised into those with a score of 7 or more and those with a score of less than 7. In patients treated with carotid artery stenting, those with an ARWMC score of 7 or more had an increased risk of stroke compared with those with a score of less than 7 (HR for any stroke 2·76, 95% CI 1·17–6·51; p=0·021; HR for non-disabling stroke 3·00, 1·10–8·36; p=0·031), but we did not see a similar association in patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (HR for any stroke 1·18, 0·40–3·55; p=0·76; HR for disabling or fatal stroke 1·41, 0·38–5·26; p=0·607). Carotid artery stenting was associated with a higher risk of stroke compared with carotid endarterectomy in patients with an ARWMC score of 7 or more (HR for any stroke 2·98, 1·29–6·93; p=0·011; HR for non-disabling stroke 6·34, 1·45–27·71; p=0·014), but there was no risk difference in patients with an ARWMC score of less than 7.InterpretationThe presence of white-matter lesions on brain imaging should be taken into account when selecting patients for carotid revascularisation. Carotid artery stenting should be avoided in patients with more extensive white-matter lesions, but might be an acceptable alternative to carotid endarterectomy in patients with less extensive lesions.FundingMedical Research Council, the Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, the European Union Research Framework Programme 5.

Highlights

  • Findings from randomised controlled trials comparing carotid artery stenting with carotid endarterectomy have consistently shown that, in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis, carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher risk of periprocedural stroke or death than carotid endarterectomy.[1,2,3,4]

  • We detected no difference in the proportion of patients receiving carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy in the two groups, or in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups

  • Our findings show that the risk of stenting strongly depends on the severity of white-matter damage: the risk of stroke was similar between the two treatment groups in patients with less extensive whitematter lesions (ARWMC score

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Findings from randomised controlled trials comparing carotid artery stenting with carotid endarterectomy have consistently shown that, in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis, carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher risk of periprocedural stroke or death than carotid endarterectomy.[1,2,3,4] Findings from a systematic review of 11 randomised controlled trials showed a 70% increase in the risk of stenting compared with endarterectomy in terms of the occurrence of any stroke or death between randomisation and 30 days after treatment in symptomatic patients (odds ratio 1·72, 95% CI 1·29–2·31).[5]. A better understanding of risk factors for procedural stroke www.thelancet.com/neurology Vol 12 September 2013

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call