Abstract

Local treatment is known to improve survival in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In the present study, we examined the role of tumor burden in tumor aggressiveness, as well as the pathway responsible for these changes. We used human and murine prostate cancer cell lines to examine the role of tumor burden in tumor aggressiveness, as well as its correlation with cancer stem cell (CSC) marker levels and IL-6 signaling. Furthermore, 167 prostate cancer biopsy specimens were analyzed in terms of correlations of IL-6 and CD44 levels with clinical patient characteristics. Data from preclinical models showed that larger tumor burden was associated with more aggressive tumor growth associated and increased CD44 expression. Using cellular experiments and orthotopic tumor models, we showed that CD44+ prostate cancer cells have CSC-like properties, enhanced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), and a more immunosuppressive microenvironment. There was a significant correlation between IL-6 and CD44 levels based on in vitro testing of clinical samples. Blockade of IL-6/STAT3 signaling attenuated the expression of CD44, CSC-like properties, and aggressive tumor behavior in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, CD44 expression is significantly associated with tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer and activation of IL-6 signaling leads to a suitable microenvironment for the induction of CD44 expression. Based on our study, reduced tumor burden was associated with attenuated IL-6 signaling and augmented tumor rejection in the microenvironment, which might mediate the benefit of clinical adoption with aggressive local therapy.

Highlights

  • Prostate cancer is a major health concern in male populations and one of the most common cancers worldwide [1]

  • CD44 expression is significantly associated with tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer and activation of IL-6 signaling leads to a suitable microenvironment for the induction of CD44 expression

  • Tumor Burden after Local Treatment Was Correlated with Tumor Aggressiveness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prostate cancer is a major health concern in male populations and one of the most common cancers worldwide [1]. The management of advanced prostate cancer continues to be a challenge, and there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal first-line treatment. The use of prostate-directed therapy for males with advanced prostate cancer has been assessed, and recent data support its addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) [3,4,5]. The addition of aggressive local treatment provided a survival benefit for locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) patients versus those treated with conservative treatment. These results are supported by data from the STAMPEDE trial and several retrospective series [3,6,7,8]. The advantages of aggressive therapy with either surgery or radiotherapy (RT)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call