Abstract
The effect of finite transit times for the tagging bolus is known to be a significant error source for perfusion quantification using the flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique. It is shown that, in the presence of transit times, both the slice-selective (SS) and nonselective (NS) inversion recovery experiments actually consist of an NS period followed by an SS period. This mixed process can be described using a newly defined time constant called the "switching time," which separates the two periods. Calculations predict that finite transit times always lead to decreased flow values in the signal-intensity-difference approach, but that the measured flows in the T(1)-difference approach may be decreased or increased. This theory well explains our recent experimental flow results on cat brain as a function of predelay. The results show the signal-intensity-difference method is superior over the T(1)-difference approach in terms of convenience and ease of quantification. Magn Reson Med 42:890-894, 1999.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.