Abstract

Positive and unlabeled learning (PUL) algorithm, an one-class classifier which is trained by positive samples and unlabeled samples, has been used in remote sensing classification. However, the effect of training strategy of PUL has not been investigated. This study tested the performances of PUL-SVM on cropland mapping by Landsat TM data using the training samples with different sizes and different purity levels. It is found that the highest accuracy is achieved when the sizes of positive sample and unlabeled sample are comparable if using the random strategy. In contrast, if using the purer positive samples, it is more difficult to find the optimal unlabeled sample size. Therefore, it is recommended the random strategy for the positive samples, and the balanced sizes for positive and unlabeled samples when using PUL-SVM.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.