Abstract

Simple SummaryHow tourist camp activities affect individual elephant welfare is an important and highly debated topic. Saliva and fecal samples were collected monthly for 1 year from 44 female Asian elephants that participated in three programs (saddle-, bareback-, or no-riding), and analyzed for glucocorticoids (GC) and immunoglobulin A (IgA). The hypothesis was that better welfare would be associated with low GC and high IgA concentrations. Both biomarkers showed significant variation with respect to camp size, riding activities, tourist-to-elephant ratios and seasonality, but not always consistently between feces and saliva, and not always in the predicted direction. However, there was no clear indication that riding per se negatively affected these two biomarkers. The lack of consistent responses highlights the difficulty in interpreting physiological data in relation to management factors, and suggests more work is needed to differentiate between potential chronic (feces) and acute (saliva) responses.Asian elephants have been an important part of wildlife ecotourism in Thailand for over two decades. Elephants in tourist camps are exposed to a variety of management styles and daily activities that can potentially affect health and welfare. This study investigated relationships between a novel welfare biomarker, immunoglobulin A (IgA), and daily camp activities, and compared results to glucocorticoid (GC) measures. Often no-riding camps are portrayed as providing better welfare than camps that offer riding. Therefore, we predicted that elephants at no-riding camps would have lower GC and higher IgA concentrations, and a low GC/IgA ratio. Forty-four female elephants from six elephant camps were divided into three groups based on riding activities: saddle-riding, bareback-riding, and no-riding. Fecal and salivary samples were collected monthly for 1 year along with evaluations of body condition, foot health, and wounding. Camp environment and management varied among camps, although the major difference was in riding activities. Concentrations of GCs and IgA varied among the working groups, but not always consistently between sample matrices. Overall fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations were lowest in the saddle-riding group. Only in one bareback-riding camp did the elephants exhibit a potentially positive welfare response with a low GC/IgA ratio over time. Other results varied between the two biomarkers, with considerable variability across camps, suggesting there is more to good welfare than whether elephants participate in riding or not. Several other human-induced stressors, like chaining, ankus use, and limited social opportunities are likely to be impacting well-being and should be considered to ensure management practices meet physical and psychological welfare needs.

Highlights

  • The Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) is an iconic species in Thailand, and one that has played an essential role in wildlife-based ecotourism for decades [1,2]

  • In this study, no significant correlations were found between GCs and immunoglobulin A (IgA) which was comparable to previous studies in Asian elephants [16,24]. This was the first study to use IgA in a welfare assessment of elephants participating in different tourist activities

  • This may suggest that other factors besides riding affect camp elephant welfare, such as those related to social management, ankus use, chaining, after-hours management, health care, and quality of the mahout–elephant relationship

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) is an iconic species in Thailand, and one that has played an essential role in wildlife-based ecotourism for decades [1,2]. 3700 tamed Asian elephants working in tourist facilities (i.e., elephant camps) across Thailand [3,4]. Elephants take part in a variety of tourist activities, like riding with or without a saddle, shows, feeding, and bathing [1,7]. While elephant trekking and riding are historically popular activities [1,8], recent criticisms have questioned whether they are harmful to elephant well-being [2]. While limiting tourist interactions with elephants likely reduces the amount of control needed to keep animals and people safe, and may be better for welfare, new questions arise as to whether elephants are able to get adequate exercise and if diets are properly balanced [2,10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call